Pablo Cuevas vs Nicolas Jarry — Montevideo CH Quarter-final

Montevideo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
URU1
Pablo Cuevas
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2014
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI5
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Cuevas P.
7-6 6-4
Jarry N.
Cuevas P.
7762
Jarry N.
6440

Pablo Cuevas defeated Nicolas Jarry 7-6 6-4 in the Montevideo CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Pablo Cuevas claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-24EastbourneR32grassNicolas Jarry6-1 7-6(4)
2018-02-19Rio de JaneiroQFclayNicolas Jarry7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas P.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
9.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas P.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
98
Break points won·Dominant
32
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cuevas P.[1]
Dellien H.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Dellien H.
Arguello F.[3]
1-66-06-4
Cuevas P.[1]
Cachin P.[8]
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Cuevas P.[1]
Jarry N.[5]
7-646-4
Dellien H.
Samper Montana J.[6]
6-736-26-1
Arguello F.[3]
Molteni A.[7]
6-47-5
Cachin P.[8]
Quinzi G.
7-676-4
R16
Cachin P.[8]
Trungelliti M.
2-67-656-4
Arguello F.[3]
Bourgue M.
6-36-4
Dellien H.
Pini S.
6-36-2
Quinzi G.
Lipovsek Puches T.
7-626-2
Molteni A.[7]
Coria F.
6-37-5
Samper Montana J.[6]
Olivo R.
6-44-66-3
Jarry N.[5]
Ficovich J.
6-46-2
Cuevas P.[1]
Senattore R.
6-16-3
R32
Pini S.
Barros M.
6-12-0
Cuevas P.[1]
Makiguchi R.
6-46-1
Dellien H.
Riba P.[2]
6-23-0
Senattore R.
Maresca S.
6-17-63
Olivo R.
Behar A.
6-26-4
Trungelliti M.
Volfson D.
4-66-26-1
Molteni A.[7]
Cuevas M.
7-57-66
Cachin P.[8]
Sorgi J.
5-76-36-2
Jarry N.[5]
Leite W.
6-46-2
Ficovich J.
Miele A.
6-46-0
Samper Montana J.[6]
Ameal J.
3-66-36-1
Bourgue M.
Kicker N.
6-33-66-4
Quinzi G.
Lama G.[4]
6-786-46-1
Coria F.
Buchhass M.
6-14-66-1
Arguello F.[3]
Doria L.
6-16-3
Lipovsek Puches T.
Vinicius Dias M.
6-26-1