Jordan Thompson vs Denis Kudla — Tiburon CH Round of 32

Tiburon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 October 2014
hard
USA5
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Thompson J.
5-7 6-3 6-4
Kudla D.
Thompson J.
5662
Kudla D.
7341

Jordan Thompson defeated Denis Kudla 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the Tiburon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-05DallasR16hardJordan Thompson6-1 6-1
2023-02-13Delray BeachR32hardDenis Kudla3-6 6-4 7-6(2)
2023-02-06DallasR32hardJordan Thompson6-1 7-5
2019-05-20GenevaR32clayDenis Kudla5-7 6-2 6-4
2017-06-19Queen's ClubQ1grassJordan Thompson5-7 7-6(7) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Slight edge
24
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
91
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Querrey S.[1]
Millman J.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Millman J.
Langer N.
5-76-27-5
Querrey S.[1]
Reid M.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Querrey S.[1]
Mcgee J.
6-17-5
Langer N.
Giron M.
6-41-67-5
Millman J.
Smyczek T.[2]
6-15-76-3
Reid M.
Fratangelo B.
6-47-5
R16
Giron M.
Klahn B.[3]
7-637-61
Smyczek T.[2]
Donaldson J.
2-67-637-5
Fratangelo B.
Sorensen L.
4-67-56-4
Querrey S.[1]
Williams R.
6-36-2
Millman J.
Broady L.
6-16-2
Mcgee J.
Thompson J.
7-606-3
Reid M.
Wolmarans F.
6-25-76-3
Langer N.
Smith J.
7-637-5
R32
Sorensen L.
Vanni L.[8]
6-35-77-5
Broady L.
Dancevic F.[7]
6-37-63
Wolmarans F.
Odesnik W.
4-67-636-2
Williams R.
Ymer E.
6-41-66-1
Giron M.
Bolt A.
6-06-3
Thompson J.
Kudla D.[5]
5-76-36-4
Donaldson J.
Novikov D.
6-36-2
Mcgee J.
Edmund K.
3-66-36-3
Smith J.
Fabbiano T.
6-16-4
Millman J.
Buchanan C.
6-06-0
Smyczek T.[2]
Harrison R.
6-36-3
Reid M.
Fawcett T.
7-57-5
Langer N.
De Bakker T.[6]
6-16-3
Fratangelo B.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-4
Querrey S.[1]
Nguyen D.
6-16-4
Klahn B.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-47-63