Horacio Zeballos vs Nicolas Jarry — Quito CH Final

Quito CH · CHALLENGER · Final
ARG3
Horacio Zeballos
41 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2014
clay
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Zeballos H.
6-4 7-6
Jarry N.
Zeballos H.
67112
Jarry N.
4690

Horacio Zeballos defeated Nicolas Jarry 6-4 7-6 in the Quito CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Jarry came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Horacio Zeballos claimed a first win over Nicolas Jarry in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-26Sao PauloSFclayNicolas Jarry6-7(5) 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Zeballos H.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Jarry N.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Zeballos H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeballos H.Jarry N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
68%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
9.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeballos H.Jarry N.
Clutch Rating·Even
45
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
98
Break points won·Clear edge
17
4
Deciding sets·Even
57
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zeballos H.[3]
Jarry N.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Zeballos H.[3]
Molteni A.
5-76-37-5
Jarry N.
Souza J.[2]
6-746-36-3
Quarter-finals
Molteni A.
Escobar G.
6-46-0
Souza J.[2]
Buchanan C.[6]
7-616-3
Zeballos H.[3]
Dellien H.
7-57-65
Jarry N.
Londero J.[7]
6-27-5
R16
Souza J.[2]
Gomez E.
6-26-3
Molteni A.
Mena F.
4-67-656-2
Zeballos H.[3]
King K.
7-685-76-3
Dellien H.
Angelinos T.
7-646-4
Londero J.[7]
Struvay E.
6-747-616-3
Jarry N.
Pella G.[4]
7-616-2
Buchanan C.[6]
Miele A.
6-26-736-1
Escobar G.
Estrella V.[1]
4-66-37-64
R32
Zeballos H.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-46-4
Dellien H.
Spir J.
6-27-5
Angelinos T.
Mektic N.[8]
6-36-4
Estrella V.[1]
Leite W.
6-26-4
Escobar G.
Beretta D.
2-66-36-4
Molteni A.
Endara I.
7-56-4
King K.
Campozano J.
6-36-4
Londero J.[7]
Arevalo M.
7-56-767-62
Struvay E.
Cunha H.
4-66-26-2
Jarry N.
Velotti A.
6-36-4
Pella G.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-46-2
Miele A.
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-66-26-4
Buchanan C.[6]
Trungelliti M.
6-36-4
Mena F.
Krajicek A.[5]
6-47-64
Gomez E.
Konstantinov D.
6-36-0
Souza J.[2]
Echazu M.
6-36-2