Nicolas Jarry vs Guido Pella — Quito CH Round of 16

Quito CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Nicolas Jarry
CHI
Nicolas Jarry
#764ATP
1648ELO
1642Clay ELO
$70kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2014
clay
ARG4
Guido Pella
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWL
Jarry N.
7-6 6-2
Pella G.
Jarry N.
7762
Pella G.
6120

Nicolas Jarry defeated Guido Pella 7-6 6-2 in the Quito CH round of 16 on clay. Nicolas Jarry extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Jarry closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-11-19Davis Cup Finals RR: ARG vs CHIRRhardGuido Pella6-4 6-3
2018-02-26Sao PauloR16clayNicolas Jarry6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(2)

Serve vs return

This season
Jarry N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pella G.

Pella G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jarry N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jarry N.Pella G.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jarry N.Pella G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
64
Break points saved·Even
98
95
Break points won·Dominant
4
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
85
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zeballos H.[3]
Jarry N.
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Zeballos H.[3]
Molteni A.
5-76-37-5
Jarry N.
Souza J.[2]
6-746-36-3
Quarter-finals
Molteni A.
Escobar G.
6-46-0
Souza J.[2]
Buchanan C.[6]
7-616-3
Zeballos H.[3]
Dellien H.
7-57-65
Jarry N.
Londero J.[7]
6-27-5
R16
Souza J.[2]
Gomez E.
6-26-3
Molteni A.
Mena F.
4-67-656-2
Zeballos H.[3]
King K.
7-685-76-3
Dellien H.
Angelinos T.
7-646-4
Londero J.[7]
Struvay E.
6-747-616-3
Jarry N.
Pella G.[4]
7-616-2
Buchanan C.[6]
Miele A.
6-26-736-1
Escobar G.
Estrella V.[1]
4-66-37-64
R32
Zeballos H.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-46-4
Dellien H.
Spir J.
6-27-5
Angelinos T.
Mektic N.[8]
6-36-4
Estrella V.[1]
Leite W.
6-26-4
Escobar G.
Beretta D.
2-66-36-4
Molteni A.
Endara I.
7-56-4
King K.
Campozano J.
6-36-4
Londero J.[7]
Arevalo M.
7-56-767-62
Struvay E.
Cunha H.
4-66-26-2
Jarry N.
Velotti A.
6-36-4
Pella G.[4]
Lapentti G.
6-46-2
Miele A.
Lipovsek Puches T.
3-66-26-4
Buchanan C.[6]
Trungelliti M.
6-36-4
Mena F.
Krajicek A.[5]
6-47-64
Gomez E.
Konstantinov D.
6-36-0
Souza J.[2]
Echazu M.
6-36-2