Kimiko Date Krumm vs Monica Puig — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
JPN
Kimiko Date Krumm
55 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2014
grass
PUR12
Monica Puig
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Date Krumm K.
2-6 6-4 7-6
Puig M.
Date Krumm K.
26792
Puig M.
64671

Kimiko Date Krumm defeated Monica Puig 2-6 6-4 7-6 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Kimiko Date Krumm came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Kimiko Date Krumm extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-03-31MonterreyQFhardKimiko Date Krumm6-4 6-7(2) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Date Krumm K.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Puig M.

Puig M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Date Krumm K.

Serve advantage — Puig M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Date Krumm K.Puig M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.8
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Date Krumm K.Puig M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
22
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
42
63
Break points won·Clear edge
74
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
41
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ivanovic A.[1]
Strycova B.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Ivanovic A.[1]
Zhang S.[9]
6-26-2
Strycova B.
Dellacqua C.[16]
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Zhang S.[9]
Stephens S.[3]
6-36-1
Ivanovic A.[1]
Koukalova K.[6]
6-16-4
Strycova B.
Flipkens K.[4]
6-46-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Date Krumm K.
6-16-0
R16
Ivanovic A.[1]
Davis L.
6-16-1
Koukalova K.[6]
Vandeweghe C.
3-67-636-4
Stephens S.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
7-642-66-1
Strycova B.
Babos T.
6-20-66-3
Flipkens K.[4]
Wozniak A.
1-67-56-4
Date Krumm K.
Hantuchova D.[7]
6-46-0
Dellacqua C.[16]
Stosur S.[2]
2-66-26-2
Zhang S.[9]
Cetkovska P.
6-07-66
R32
Ivanovic A.[1]
Barthel M.
6-46-1
Davis L.
Duval V.
6-22-66-2
Vandeweghe C.
Wickmayer Y.
5-77-56-1
Stephens S.[3]
Schiavone F.
6-26-4
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok N.
7-646-1
Zhang S.[9]
Peer S.
6-33-66-2
Cetkovska P.
Rybarikova M.[8]
6-47-5
Babos T.
Keys M.[11]
6-26-1
Wozniak A.
Konta J.
6-46-2
Flipkens K.[4]
Giorgi C.
6-36-2
Date Krumm K.
Puig M.[12]
2-66-47-67
Stosur S.[2]
Mchale C.
6-16-3
Strycova B.
Safarova L.[5]
6-33-67-5
Hantuchova D.[7]
Bencic B.
6-16-4
Koukalova K.[6]
Razzano V.
5-77-657-60
Dellacqua C.[16]
Lepchenko V.
6-46-3
R64
Barthel M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-16-4
Davis L.
Paszek T.
6-33-66-2
Duval V.
Garcia C.[13]
6-26-4
Wickmayer Y.
Jovanovski B.[10]
6-46-4
Vandeweghe C.
Diyas Z.
6-47-5
Razzano V.
Pliskova K.
7-616-3
Kichenok N.
Fichman S.
6-767-626-3
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok L.
7-636-3
Zhang S.[9]
Daniilidou E.
7-56-4
Peer S.
Mladenovic K.
4-66-26-2
Cetkovska P.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
6-36-4
Strycova B.
Broady N.
5-76-46-3
Babos T.
Erakovic M.
6-36-4
Keys M.[11]
Pereira T.
6-36-3
Konta J.
Nara K.[14]
6-36-1
Bencic B.
Vekic D.
6-46-4
Date Krumm K.
Ormaechea P.
6-36-1
Puig M.[12]
Voegele S.
6-736-26-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Radwanska U.
6-16-3
Lepchenko V.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-46-0
Mchale C.
Schmiedlova A.
7-656-4
Giorgi C.
Dunne K.
4-66-12-1
Schiavone F.
Zheng J.
6-36-4
Wozniak A.
Watson H.
2-67-56-4