Kimiko Date Krumm vs Daniela Hantuchova — Birmingham Round of 16

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 16
JPN
Kimiko Date Krumm
55 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2014
grass
SVK7
Daniela Hantuchova
43 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLW
Date Krumm K.
6-4 6-0
Hantuchova D.
Date Krumm K.
662
Hantuchova D.
400

Kimiko Date Krumm defeated Daniela Hantuchova 6-4 6-0 in the Birmingham round of 16 on grass. Kimiko Date Krumm extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-05-02MadridR64clayDaniela Hantuchova6-3 6-3
2011-02-07PattayaR16hardDaniela Hantuchova7-6(3) 6-3
2010-09-27TokyoR32hardKimiko Date Krumm2-6 6-0 4-0 RET
2009-09-21SeoulQFhardKimiko Date Krumm7-6(3) 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Date Krumm K.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hantuchova D.

Hantuchova D.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Date Krumm K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Date Krumm K.Hantuchova D.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
53%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
47%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Date Krumm K.Hantuchova D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
22
58
Break points saved·Dominant
42
68
Break points won·Slight edge
74
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ivanovic A.[1]
Strycova B.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Ivanovic A.[1]
Zhang S.[9]
6-26-2
Strycova B.
Dellacqua C.[16]
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Zhang S.[9]
Stephens S.[3]
6-36-1
Ivanovic A.[1]
Koukalova K.[6]
6-16-4
Strycova B.
Flipkens K.[4]
6-46-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Date Krumm K.
6-16-0
R16
Ivanovic A.[1]
Davis L.
6-16-1
Koukalova K.[6]
Vandeweghe C.
3-67-636-4
Stephens S.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
7-642-66-1
Strycova B.
Babos T.
6-20-66-3
Flipkens K.[4]
Wozniak A.
1-67-56-4
Date Krumm K.
Hantuchova D.[7]
6-46-0
Dellacqua C.[16]
Stosur S.[2]
2-66-26-2
Zhang S.[9]
Cetkovska P.
6-07-66
R32
Ivanovic A.[1]
Barthel M.
6-46-1
Davis L.
Duval V.
6-22-66-2
Vandeweghe C.
Wickmayer Y.
5-77-56-1
Stephens S.[3]
Schiavone F.
6-26-4
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok N.
7-646-1
Zhang S.[9]
Peer S.
6-33-66-2
Cetkovska P.
Rybarikova M.[8]
6-47-5
Babos T.
Keys M.[11]
6-26-1
Wozniak A.
Konta J.
6-46-2
Flipkens K.[4]
Giorgi C.
6-36-2
Date Krumm K.
Puig M.[12]
2-66-47-67
Stosur S.[2]
Mchale C.
6-16-3
Strycova B.
Safarova L.[5]
6-33-67-5
Hantuchova D.[7]
Bencic B.
6-16-4
Koukalova K.[6]
Razzano V.
5-77-657-60
Dellacqua C.[16]
Lepchenko V.
6-46-3
R64
Barthel M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-16-4
Davis L.
Paszek T.
6-33-66-2
Duval V.
Garcia C.[13]
6-26-4
Wickmayer Y.
Jovanovski B.[10]
6-46-4
Vandeweghe C.
Diyas Z.
6-47-5
Razzano V.
Pliskova K.
7-616-3
Kichenok N.
Fichman S.
6-767-626-3
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok L.
7-636-3
Zhang S.[9]
Daniilidou E.
7-56-4
Peer S.
Mladenovic K.
4-66-26-2
Cetkovska P.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
6-36-4
Strycova B.
Broady N.
5-76-46-3
Babos T.
Erakovic M.
6-36-4
Keys M.[11]
Pereira T.
6-36-3
Konta J.
Nara K.[14]
6-36-1
Bencic B.
Vekic D.
6-46-4
Date Krumm K.
Ormaechea P.
6-36-1
Puig M.[12]
Voegele S.
6-736-26-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Radwanska U.
6-16-3
Lepchenko V.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-46-0
Mchale C.
Schmiedlova A.
7-656-4
Giorgi C.
Dunne K.
4-66-12-1
Schiavone F.
Zheng J.
6-36-4
Wozniak A.
Watson H.
2-67-56-4