Lukasz Kubot vs Daniel Gimeno TraverBasel Round of 32

Basel · ATP · Round of 32
44 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2013
hard
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Kubot L.
7-6 6-2
Gimeno Traver D.
Kubot L.
7862
Gimeno Traver D.
662

Lukasz Kubot defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 7-6 6-2 in the Basel round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukasz Kubot came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's round of 16. Lukasz Kubot extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukasz Kubot closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayLukasz Kubot2-6 6-1 7-6(4)
2013-12-30DohaR32hardLukasz Kubot6-4 6-3
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardDaniel Gimeno Traver6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 4-6 6-4
2012-09-17St. PetersburgR16carpetDaniel Gimeno Traver6-4 7-6(5)
2011-07-11StuttgartR32grassLukasz Kubot7-6(2) 3-6 6-2
2009-02-09Costa Do SauipeR32hardLukasz Kubot7-6(7) 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kubot L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kubot L.

Serve advantage — Gimeno Traver D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
15
Break points saved·Dominant
78
50
Break points won·Slight edge
38
30
Deciding sets·Even
26
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast