Lukasz Kubot vs Daniel Gimeno TraverCosta Do Sauipe Round of 32

Costa Do Sauipe · ATP · Round of 32
44 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2009
hard
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Kubot L.
7-6 1-6 6-3
Gimeno Traver D.
Kubot L.
79162
Gimeno Traver D.
67631

Lukasz Kubot defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 7-6 1-6 6-3 in the Costa Do Sauipe round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukasz Kubot came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Lukasz Kubot extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukasz Kubot closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayLukasz Kubot2-6 6-1 7-6(4)
2013-12-30DohaR32hardLukasz Kubot6-4 6-3
2013-10-21BaselR32hardLukasz Kubot7-6(6) 6-2
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardDaniel Gimeno Traver6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 4-6 6-4
2012-09-17St. PetersburgR16carpetDaniel Gimeno Traver6-4 7-6(5)
2011-07-11StuttgartR32grassLukasz Kubot7-6(2) 3-6 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kubot L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kubot L.

Serve advantage — Gimeno Traver D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
4.7
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
15
Break points saved·Dominant
78
50
Break points won·Slight edge
38
30
Deciding sets·Even
26
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About