Na Li vs Svetlana KuznetsovaSydney Quarter-final

Sydney · WTA · Quarter-final
44 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 January 2011
hard
41 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Li N.
3-6 7-6 6-3
Kuznetsova S.
Li N.
37762
Kuznetsova S.
66431

Na Li defeated Svetlana Kuznetsova 3-6 7-6 6-3 in the Sydney quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Svetlana Kuznetsova came in leading the head-to-head 6–3, defending last year's round of 16. Na Li narrowed the head-to-head to 6–4.

Key context

Head to head

36
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-04-26StuttgartR16clayNa Li6-3 7-5
2009-04-27StuttgartR16claySvetlana Kuznetsova4-6 6-4 7-5
2008-10-06MoscowR32hardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-4 7-5
2008-09-15TokyoR32hardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-2 1-6 6-3
2008-08-11OlympicsR64hardNa Li7-6(5) 6-4
2006-09-18BeijingQFhardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-4 4-6 6-4
2006-06-26WimbledonR32grassNa Li3-6 6-2 6-3
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR32claySvetlana Kuznetsova6-3 7-6(4)
2004-09-20BeijingR16hardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Li N.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuznetsova S.

Kuznetsova S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Li N.

Serve advantage — Li N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
67%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
47%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
82
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
81
Break points won·Slight edge
96
89
Deciding sets·Even
83
85
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
75
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast