Tomas Berdych vs John IsnerDusseldorf Round Robin

Dusseldorf · ATP · Round Robin
40 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 16 May 2010
clay
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Berdych T.
1-6 6-1 7-6
Isner J.
Berdych T.
16772
Isner J.
61641

Tomas Berdych defeated John Isner 1-6 6-1 7-6 in the Dusseldorf round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Tomas Berdych came in leading the head-to-head 6–2. Tomas Berdych extended the head-to-head to 7–2.

Key context

Head to head

62
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-05-03Madrid MastersQFclayTomas Berdych3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1)
2014-09-29BeijingQFhardTomas Berdych6-1 6-4
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR16clayTomas Berdych6-4 6-4 6-4
2014-03-19Miami MastersR16hardTomas Berdych6-3 7-5
2013-09-30BeijingQFhardTomas Berdych7-5 6-2
2012-08-19Winston-SalemFhardJohn Isner3-6 6-4 7-6(9)
2010-05-24Roland GarrosR32clayTomas Berdych6-2 6-2 6-1
2009-08-02WashingtonQFhardJohn Isner6-3 6-7(10) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Berdych T.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Isner J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Berdych T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
21.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
82
64
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Dominant
70
0
Deciding sets·Even
87
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
85
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About