Juan Ignacio Chela vs Lleyton HewittHouston Quarter-final

Houston · ATP · Quarter-final
46 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 April 2010
clay
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
Chela J.
6-4 6-3
Hewitt L.
Chela J.
662
Hewitt L.
43

Juan Ignacio Chela defeated Lleyton Hewitt 6-4 6-3 in the Houston quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending the title. Juan Ignacio Chela narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

25
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-08-31US OpenR64hardLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-3 6-4
2007-05-14Hamburg MastersR32clayLleyton Hewitt6-2 7-6(3)
2006-08-07Canada MastersR64hardLleyton Hewitt3-6 6-2 7-5
2006-01-16Australian OpenR64hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-4 6-4 6-7(8) 6-2
2005-01-17Australian OpenR32hardLleyton Hewitt6-2 4-6 6-1 6-4
2004-08-23Long IslandQFhardLleyton Hewitt6-7(6) 6-1 6-1
2004-03-08Indian Wells MastersR32hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-3 4-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Chela J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Hewitt L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chela J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
5.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 162). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
88
Break points won·Even
57
57
Deciding sets·Clear edge
50
71
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
45
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast