Lleyton Hewitt vs Juan Ignacio ChelaLong Island Quarter-final

Long Island · ATP · Quarter-final
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2004
hard
46 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Hewitt L.
6-7 6-1 6-1
Chela J.
Hewitt L.
66662
Chela J.
78111

Lleyton Hewitt defeated Juan Ignacio Chela 6-7 6-1 6-1 in the Long Island quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Lleyton Hewitt extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

43
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-04-05HoustonQFclayJuan Ignacio Chela6-4 6-3
2009-08-31US OpenR64hardLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-3 6-4
2007-05-14Hamburg MastersR32clayLleyton Hewitt6-2 7-6(3)
2006-08-07Canada MastersR64hardLleyton Hewitt3-6 6-2 7-5
2006-01-16Australian OpenR64hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-4 6-4 6-7(8) 6-2
2005-01-17Australian OpenR32hardLleyton Hewitt6-2 4-6 6-1 6-4
2004-03-08Indian Wells MastersR32hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-3 4-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Hewitt L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chela J.

Chela J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
81
Break points won·Even
57
57
Deciding sets·Clear edge
71
50
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
58
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About