Marion Bartoli vs Jelena JankovicStanford Quarter-final

Stanford · WTA · Quarter-final
41 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 July 2009
hard
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Bartoli M.
3-6 7-6 6-3
Jankovic J.
Bartoli M.
37762
Jankovic J.
66331

Marion Bartoli defeated Jelena Jankovic 3-6 7-6 6-3 in the Stanford quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Marion Bartoli came in defending last year's final. Marion Bartoli extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

44
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-09-28TokyoQFhardJelena Jankovic6-4 6-3
2009-01-19Australian OpenR16hardMarion Bartoli6-1 6-4
2007-11-05WTA Tour ChampionshipsRRcarpetMarion Bartoli6-1 1-0 RET
2007-06-25WimbledonR16grassMarion Bartoli3-6 7-5 6-3
2007-05-28Roland GarrosR16clayJelena Jankovic6-1 6-1
2006-09-18BeijingR16hardJelena Jankovic6-3 6-2
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR64clayJelena Jankovic2-6 6-4 6-1
2005-01-03AucklandQFhardMarion Bartoli3-6 7-6(6) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Bartoli M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Jankovic J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bartoli M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
47%
45%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.7
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
59
Break points saved·Even
76
80
Break points won·Even
92
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
55
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast