Mikhail Youzhny vs Gilles Simon — London Round of 16
London · ATP · Round of 16
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 11 June 2009 ·
carpet
Youzhny M.6-1 2-6 6-2
Simon G.
Youzhny M.
6262
Simon G.
1621
Mikhail Youzhny defeated Gilles Simon 6-1 2-6 6-2 in the London round of 16 on carpet. The result followed the form book — Mikhail Youzhny came in leading the head-to-head 8–4. Mikhail Youzhny extended the head-to-head to 9–4.
Key context
- Match story: Mikhail Youzhny closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–2.
Head to head
8–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-10-05 | Tokyo | R32 | hard | Gilles Simon | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2015-08-10 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2013-05-12 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | Gilles Simon | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2011-07-18 | Hamburg | SF | clay | Gilles Simon | 3-6 6-3 6-1 |
| 2011-02-21 | Dubai | R32 | hard | Gilles Simon | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2011-02-14 | Marseille | R16 | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
| 2010-08-09 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2009-11-02 | Valencia | QF | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2009-10-05 | Tokyo | R16 | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-6 6-7 6-4 |
| 2009-06-08 | Queen's Club | R16 | grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 2-6 6-2 |
| 2008-03-13 | Indian Wells Masters | R64 | hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2007-06-25 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-4 4-6 3-6 7-5 6-4 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
35
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
82
Break points won·Dominant
16
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
73
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About