Sam Querrey vs Gilles SimonDusseldorf Round Robin

Dusseldorf · ATP · Round Robin
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 May 2009
clay
41 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLLWL
Querrey S.
7-5 6-3
Simon G.
Querrey S.
762
Simon G.
53

Sam Querrey defeated Gilles Simon 7-5 6-3 in the Dusseldorf round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gilles Simon came in leading the head-to-head 6–2. Sam Querrey narrowed the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Sam Querrey closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

26
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-01-07SydneyR16hardGilles Simon7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4
2018-05-28Roland GarrosR64clayGilles Simon1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 6-1
2017-08-28US OpenR128hardSam Querrey6-4 6-3 6-4
2015-06-21NottinghamQFgrassSam Querrey5-7 7-6(8) 6-4
2013-09-16MetzQFhardGilles Simon6-4 7-6(1)
2013-05-27Roland GarrosR32clayGilles Simon2-6 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2
2010-10-04BeijingR32hardGilles Simon6-3 3-6 6-2
2008-07-14IndianapolisSFhardGilles Simon6-3 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Simon G.

Simon G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
81%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.7
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
74
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Dominant
14
68
Deciding sets·Slight edge
63
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About