Nikolay Davydenko vs Juan Martin del PotroMasters Cup Round Robin

Masters Cup · ATP · Round Robin
45 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 9 November 2008
hard
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Davydenko N.
6-3 6-2
del Potro J.
Davydenko N.
662
del Potro J.
32

Nikolay Davydenko defeated Juan Martin del Potro 6-3 6-2 in the Masters Cup round robin on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Juan Martin del Potro came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Nikolay Davydenko narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

Head to head

24
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-08-11Cincinnati MastersR32hardJuan Martin del Potro7-5 7-5
2013-03-07Indian Wells MastersR64hardJuan Martin del Potro6-3 6-4
2012-02-20MarseilleR16hardJuan Martin del Potro6-7(6) 6-4 RET
2009-11-22Tour FinalsFhardNikolay Davydenko6-3 6-4
2008-09-19Davis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUSRRclayJuan Martin del Potro6-1 6-4 6-2
2007-10-28Paris MastersR32hardNikolay Davydenko7-6(3) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Davydenko N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs del Potro J.

del Potro J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Davydenko N.

Serve advantage — del Potro J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
68%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
68%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
8.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
90
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
98
Break points won·Even
74
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About