Juan Martin del Potro vs Nikolay DavydenkoDavis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS Round Robin

Davis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS · ATP · Round Robin
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 19 September 2008
clay
45 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
del Potro J.
6-1 6-4 6-2
Davydenko N.
del Potro J.
6663
Davydenko N.
142

Juan Martin del Potro defeated Nikolay Davydenko 6-1 6-4 6-2 in the Davis Cup WG SF: ARG vs RUS round robin on clay. Juan Martin del Potro extended the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Juan Martin del Potro came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–4 6–2.

Head to head

33
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-08-11Cincinnati MastersR32hardJuan Martin del Potro7-5 7-5
2013-03-07Indian Wells MastersR64hardJuan Martin del Potro6-3 6-4
2012-02-20MarseilleR16hardJuan Martin del Potro6-7(6) 6-4 RET
2009-11-22Tour FinalsFhardNikolay Davydenko6-3 6-4
2008-11-09Masters CupRRhardNikolay Davydenko6-3 6-2
2007-10-28Paris MastersR32hardNikolay Davydenko7-6(3) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
del Potro J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Davydenko N.

Davydenko N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs del Potro J.

Serve advantage — del Potro J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
90
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Even
73
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About