Fernando Gonzalez vs Marat Safin — Davis Cup WG R1: CHI vs RUS Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: CHI vs RUS · ATP · Round Robin
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 9 February 2007
clay
Gonzalez F.6-3 7-5 6-4
Safin M.
Gonzalez F.
6763
Safin M.
354–
Fernando Gonzalez defeated Marat Safin 6-3 7-5 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG R1: CHI vs RUS round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Fernando Gonzalez came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. Fernando Gonzalez extended the head-to-head to 6–3.
Key context
- Match story: Fernando Gonzalez closed it out in three sets, 6–3 7–5 6–4.
Head to head
5–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-05 | Beijing | R16 | hard | Marat Safin | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2008-06-09 | Queen's Club | R32 | grass | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 7-6(3) |
| 2008-04-28 | Munich | QF | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 7-5 |
| 2006-07-24 | Los Angeles | R16 | hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 7-5 |
| 2006-06-26 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Fernando Gonzalez | 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-05-29 | Roland Garros | R128 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 1-6 6-3 6-1 |
| 2005-03-04 | Davis Cup WG R1: RUS vs CHI | RR | carpet | Marat Safin | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 1-6 6-7(3) 6-4 |
| 2002-03-18 | Miami Masters | R16 | hard | Marat Safin | 6-3 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
8.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (195 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
65
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Even
48
47
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
61
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
52
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About