Ai Sugiyama vs Marion BartoliZurich Round of 32

Zurich · WTA · Round of 32
51 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 October 2006
hard
41 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
Sugiyama A.
6-3 4-6 6-1
Bartoli M.
Sugiyama A.
6462
Bartoli M.
3611

Ai Sugiyama defeated Marion Bartoli 6-3 4-6 6-1 in the Zurich round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ai Sugiyama came in defending last year's round of 32. Ai Sugiyama extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Ai Sugiyama came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

44
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-02-16DubaiR64hardMarion Bartoli6-0 4-6 7-6(6)
2008-10-20LinzR32hardMarion Bartoli6-4 2-6 7-6(8)
2008-07-28MontrealQFhardMarion Bartoli6-2 6-3
2008-07-14StanfordSFhardMarion Bartoli6-3 6-3
2004-07-26San DiegoR16hardAi Sugiyama6-3 6-2
2004-06-21WimbledonR32grassAi Sugiyama6-1 6-2
2004-05-24Roland GarrosR128clayAi Sugiyama6-4 6-3
2002-05-27Roland GarrosR128clayAi Sugiyama6-3 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Sugiyama A.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Bartoli M.

Bartoli M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sugiyama A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
45%
Service points won·Even
54%
58%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Even
55%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.0
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
5.0
5.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (141 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
68
76
Break points won·Dominant
63
92
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
49
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About