Kim Clijsters vs Jelena JankovicStanford Round of 16

Stanford · WTA · Round of 16
43 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2006
hard
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Clijsters K.
5-7 6-2 6-2
Jankovic J.
Clijsters K.
5662
Jankovic J.
7221

Kim Clijsters defeated Jelena Jankovic 5-7 6-2 6-2 in the Stanford round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 7–1, defending the title. Kim Clijsters extended the head-to-head to 8–1.

Key context

Head to head

71
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-06-25WimbledonR128grassKim Clijsters6-2 6-4
2010-10-25WTA ChampionshipsRRhardKim Clijsters6-2 6-3
2009-08-17TorontoR16hardJelena Jankovic1-6 6-3 7-5
2007-01-08SydneyFhardKim Clijsters4-6 7-6(1) 6-4
2006-07-31San DiegoR16hardKim Clijsters6-4 3-6 6-3
2005-08-01San DiegoR16hardKim Clijsters6-1 6-3
2005-06-13EastbourneR32grassKim Clijsters6-1 7-6(2)
2002-07-22StanfordQFhardKim Clijsters7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Clijsters K.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Jankovic J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Clijsters K.

Serve advantage — Clijsters K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.4
2.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
80
Break points won·Slight edge
82
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast