Kim Clijsters vs Jelena JankovicWTA Championships Round Robin

WTA Championships · WTA · Round Robin
43 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 October 2010
hard
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Clijsters K.
6-2 6-3
Jankovic J.
Clijsters K.
662
Jankovic J.
23

Kim Clijsters defeated Jelena Jankovic 6-2 6-3 in the WTA Championships round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 7–1. Kim Clijsters extended the head-to-head to 8–1.

Key context

Head to head

71
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-06-25WimbledonR128grassKim Clijsters6-2 6-4
2009-08-17TorontoR16hardJelena Jankovic1-6 6-3 7-5
2007-01-08SydneyFhardKim Clijsters4-6 7-6(1) 6-4
2006-07-31San DiegoR16hardKim Clijsters6-4 3-6 6-3
2006-07-24StanfordR16hardKim Clijsters5-7 6-2 6-2
2005-08-01San DiegoR16hardKim Clijsters6-1 6-3
2005-06-13EastbourneR32grassKim Clijsters6-1 7-6(2)
2002-07-22StanfordQFhardKim Clijsters7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Clijsters K.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Jankovic J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Clijsters K.

Serve advantage — Clijsters K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
47%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
80
Break points won·Slight edge
82
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About