Tim Henman vs Thomas Johansson — Rome Masters Round of 32
Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 32
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2006
clay
Henman T.7-6 6-1
Johansson T.
Henman T.
71062
Johansson T.
681–
Tim Henman defeated Thomas Johansson 7-6 6-1 in the Rome Masters round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's round of 16. Tim Henman extended the head-to-head to 5–2.
Key context
- Match story: Tim Henman came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-02-20 | Rotterdam | R32 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2005-06-06 | Queen's Club | QF | grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2002-04-15 | Monte Carlo Masters | QF | clay | Tim Henman | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) |
| 2002-02-25 | Dubai | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2001-01-01 | Adelaide | QF | hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-3 |
| 1998-10-05 | Basel | SF | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
8.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
46
54
Break points saved·Even
76
80
Break points won·Even
55
51
Deciding sets·Clear edge
43
59
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
54
60
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
20°COvercast
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 56%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Nalbandian D.
Ancic M.
6-36-3
Federer R.
Almagro N.
6-36-727-5
Nadal R.
Gonzalez F.
6-46-3
Monfils G.
Roddick A.
6-26-3
R16
Almagro N.
Davydenko N.
7-66
Ancic M.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-36-747-5
Gonzalez F.
Berdych T.
6-26-4
Roddick A.
Rusedski G.
7-646-2
Nalbandian D.
Martin A.
7-56-4
Monfils G.
Santoro F.
7-676-2
Nadal R.
Henman T.
6-26-2
Federer R.
Stepanek R.
6-16-4
R32
Berdych T.
Malisse X.
6-26-1
Santoro F.
Hrbaty D.
7-626-3
Monfils G.
Ginepri R.
6-14-66-4
Rusedski G.
Galvani S.
7-646-4
Roddick A.
Baghdatis M.
3-66-16-2
Federer R.
Starace P.
6-37-62
Ancic M.
Serra F.
3-67-6106-0
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Safin M.
0-67-667-63
Martin A.
Kiefer N.
6-37-63
Nalbandian D.
Mathieu P.
6-26-4
Davydenko N.
Verdasco F.
6-13-66-0
Almagro N.
Acasuso J.
6-42-66-4
Stepanek R.
Nieminen J.
6-47-65
Gonzalez F.
Youzhny M.
6-45-76-3
Henman T.
Johansson T.
7-686-1
Nadal R.
Volandri F.
6-16-2
R64
Nadal R.
Moya C.
6-12-66-2
Ginepri R.
Mirnyi M.
3-66-26-3
Monfils G.
Haas T.
6-23-66-4
Berdych T.
Srichaphan P.
6-16-3
Kiefer N.
Bracciali D.
4-66-26-4
Rusedski G.
Robredo T.
5-76-36-4
Safin M.
Gabashvili T.
7-53-66-1
Johansson T.
Fognini F.
7-636-3
Galvani S.
Novak J.
6-36-4
Volandri F.
Murray A.
6-46-4
Federer R.
Chela J.
6-26-1
Starace P.
Tursunov D.
6-46-1
Martin A.
Sanguinetti D.
6-46-2
Malisse X.
Gaudio G.
4-66-36-3
Serra F.
Blake J.
6-47-63
Santoro F.
Monaco J.
4-66-26-3
Mathieu P.
Ferrero J.
6-16-3
Youzhny M.
Seppi A.
6-27-67
Henman T.
Di Mauro A.
7-57-62
Baghdatis M.
Rochus O.
7-56-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Coria G.
6-36-2
Nalbandian D.
Vicente F.
6-23-66-3
Verdasco F.
Bolelli S.
6-42-66-1
Hrbaty D.
Ljubicic I.
5-77-646-4
Nieminen J.
Grosjean S.
6-26-1
Davydenko N.
Pashanski B.
6-16-4
Roddick A.
Hanescu V.
6-16-0
Ancic M.
Horna L.
6-46-4
Stepanek R.
Lopez F.
6-46-4
Acasuso J.
Ferrer D.
7-56-0
Almagro N.
Massu N.
7-56-4
Gonzalez F.
Wawrinka S.
6-46-4