Tim Henman vs Thomas Johansson — Adelaide Quarter-final
Adelaide · ATP · Quarter-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 January 2001
hard
Henman T.7-6 6-7 6-3
Johansson T.
Henman T.
776462
Johansson T.
627731
Tim Henman defeated Thomas Johansson 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Adelaide quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's quarter-final. Tim Henman extended the head-to-head to 5–2.
Key context
- Match story: Tim Henman closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-05-08 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | Tim Henman | 7-6(8) 6-1 |
| 2006-02-20 | Rotterdam | R32 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2005-06-06 | Queen's Club | QF | grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2002-04-15 | Monte Carlo Masters | QF | clay | Tim Henman | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) |
| 2002-02-25 | Dubai | QF | hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-3 |
| 1998-10-05 | Basel | SF | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
46
54
Break points saved·Even
76
80
Break points won·Even
55
51
Deciding sets·Clear edge
43
59
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
54
60
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
36°CClear
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 14%
Draw
Semi-finals
Massu N.
Henman T.
3-67-56-2
Haas T.
Stoltenberg J.
7-636-4
Henman T.
Martin A.
7-54-66-2
Philippoussis M.
Arazi H.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Henman T.
Johansson T.
7-626-746-3
Stoltenberg J.
Martin A.
6-36-4
Massu N.
Ljubicic I.
6-757-656-2
Haas T.
Hewitt L.
6-40-66-1
Arazi H.
Ljubicic I.
4-1
Martin A.
Enqvist T.
3-66-46-3
Philippoussis M.
Martin T.
4-66-26-2
Henman T.
Rusedski G.
6-46-4
R16
Johansson T.
Vinck C.
7-56-3
Henman T.
Tarango J.
6-16-4
Hewitt L.
Phau B.
6-756-46-0
Massu N.
Clement A.
6-26-2
Ljubicic I.
Pavel A.
3-67-56-4
Martin A.
Rochus C.
3-67-657-5
Stoltenberg J.
Goldstein P.
6-26-2
Haas T.
Malisse X.
7-56-3
Henman T.
Carlsen K.
7-62
Ljubicic I.
Massu N.
7-657-5
Arazi H.
Mathieu P.
6-40-66-2
Philippoussis M.
Schalken S.
6-06-3
Martin T.
Llodra M.
7-56-4
Martin A.
Chela J.
6-27-5
Enqvist T.
Golmard J.
6-44-66-1
Rusedski G.
Draper S.
6-13-66-4
R32
Martin A.
Puentes G.
6-26-3
Ljubicic I.
Sargsian S.
6-27-5
Henman T.
Rusedski G.
6-27-64
Tarango J.
Kohlmann M.
6-37-64
Vinck C.
Popp A.
7-656-4
Johansson T.
Mantilla F.
7-646-2
Clement A.
Gaudenzi A.
6-716-06-3
Massu N.
Sluiter R.
6-26-4
Pavel A.
Gimelstob J.
6-26-2
Rochus C.
Ilie A.
1-67-627-5
Goldstein P.
Jones A.
6-46-2
Stoltenberg J.
Grosjean S.
6-36-2
Haas T.
Smith L.
6-36-3
Malisse X.
Woodruff C.
2-66-36-2
Phau B.
Woodbridge T.
7-56-1
Hewitt L.
Arthurs W.
6-46-3
Ljubicic I.
Russell M.
7-627-613
Martin A.
Vinciguerra A.
6-36-4
Chela J.
Delgado R.
6-16-3
Martin T.
Sampras P.
3-66-36-4
Llodra M.
Ferreira W.
6-33-66-3
Golmard J.
Arthurs W.
6-46-0
Henman T.
Fromberg R.
6-36-756-0
Carlsen K.
Black W.
7-646-736-0
Draper S.
Sa A.
6-16-2
Enqvist T.
Rios M.
6-06-3
Rusedski G.
Diaz J.
6-37-64
Philippoussis M.
Boutter J.
6-36-4
Schalken S.
Kim A.
6-36-2
Arazi H.
Kratochvil M.
6-32-67-63
Mathieu P.
Ilie A.
6-36-1
Massu N.
Savolt A.
6-26-1