Venus Williams vs Daniela Hantuchova — New Haven Semi-final
New Haven · WTA · Semi-final
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2002
hard
Williams V.6-3 6-3
Hantuchova D.
Williams V.
662
Hantuchova D.
33–
Venus Williams defeated Daniela Hantuchova 6-3 6-3 in the New Haven semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 9–1, defending the title. Venus Williams extended the head-to-head to 10–1.
Key context
- Match story: Venus Williams dropped just 6 games past Daniela Hantuchova.
Head to head
9–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-06-13 | Eastbourne | QF | grass | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 5-7 6-2 |
| 2010-03-22 | Miami | R16 | hard | Venus Williams | 1-6 7-5 6-4 |
| 2007-07-30 | San Diego | R16 | hard | Venus Williams | 6-0 6-3 |
| 2005-08-29 | US Open | R32 | hard | Venus Williams | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Venus Williams | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2004-03-24 | Miami | R32 | hard | Venus Williams | 7-6(0) 6-2 |
| 2003-02-10 | Antwerp | SF | hard | Venus Williams | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2003-01-13 | Australian Open | QF | hard | Venus Williams | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2002-01-14 | Australian Open | R32 | hard | Venus Williams | 3-6 6-0 6-4 |
| 2001-06-25 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Venus Williams | 6-3 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.8
3.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
54
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
68
Break points won·Clear edge
83
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
30
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
55
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Davenport L.
Mauresmo A.
7-676-3
Myskina A.
Hingis M.
6-726-46-0
Hantuchova D.
Schnyder P.
6-46-3
Williams V.
Granville L.
6-26-1
R16
Williams V.
Shaughnessy M.
6-26-4
Hingis M.
Stevenson A.
7-56-4
Myskina A.
Henin J.
7-56-2
Hantuchova D.
Majoli I.
4-66-46-1
Schnyder P.
Sucha M.
2-66-36-3
Granville L.
Roesch A.
7-56-2
Mauresmo A.
Bovina E.
6-44-67-61
Davenport L.
Tulyaganova I.
6-47-63
R32
Schnyder P.
Marrero M.
6-46-1
Myskina A.
Martinez C.
6-16-4
Shaughnessy M.
Tanasugarn T.
4-66-27-5
Granville L.
Bedanova D.
3-66-46-1
Roesch A.
Dementieva E.
6-31-66-3
Majoli I.
Farina Elia S.
6-24-67-62
Hantuchova D.
Hopkins J.
6-36-4
Hingis M.
Smashnova A.
6-46-4
Stevenson A.
Kostanic Tosic J.
6-37-5
Mauresmo A.
Panova T.
6-26-2
Bovina E.
Raymond L.
4-66-16-2
Tulyaganova I.
Sanchez Vicario A.
7-656-3