Lleyton Hewitt vs Tim HenmanScottsdale Final

Scottsdale · ATP · Final
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 March 2000
hard
51 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLWLWL
Hewitt L.
6-4 7-6
Henman T.
Hewitt L.
6772
Henman T.
462

Lleyton Hewitt defeated Tim Henman 6-4 7-6 in the Scottsdale final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 8–1, defending last year's final. Lleyton Hewitt extended the head-to-head to 9–1.

Key context

Head to head

81
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2006-06-12Queen's ClubSFgrassLleyton Hewitt6-3 3-6 6-2
2006-03-20Miami MastersR64hardTim Henman7-6(5) 6-3
2004-08-02Cincinnati MastersR16hardLleyton Hewitt6-1 6-4
2004-02-16RotterdamSFhardLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-3
2002-06-24WimbledonSFgrassLleyton Hewitt7-5 6-1 7-5
2002-06-10Queen's ClubFgrassLleyton Hewitt4-6 6-1 6-4
2002-03-11Indian Wells MastersFhardLleyton Hewitt6-1 6-2
2001-06-11Queen's ClubFgrassLleyton Hewitt7-6(3) 7-6(3)
2000-10-30Stuttgart MastersR16carpetLleyton Hewitt3-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Hewitt L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Henman T.

Henman T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Serve advantage — Henman T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
76
Break points won·Even
57
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
43
Tiebreaks·Even
58
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About