Serena Williams vs Martina Hingis — Manhattan Beach Semi-final

Manhattan Beach · WTA · Semi-final
USA
Serena Williams
44 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 August 1999
hard
SUI
Martina Hingis
45 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Williams S.
6-3 7-5
Hingis M.
Williams S.
672
Hingis M.
35–

Serena Williams defeated Martina Hingis 6-3 7-5 in the Manhattan Beach semi-final on hard. Serena Williams extended the head-to-head to 7–6.

Key context

Head to head

6–6
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2002-03-18MiamiQFhardSerena Williams6-4 6-0
2002-02-25ScottsdaleSFhardSerena Williams6-1 3-6 6-4
2001-08-27US OpenSFhardSerena Williams6-3 6-2
2001-01-15Australian OpenQFhardMartina Hingis6-2 3-6 8-6
2001-01-07SydneyQFhardMartina Hingis6-4 7-5
2000-08-14MontrealFhardMartina Hingis0-6 6-3 3-0 RET
2000-08-07Los AngelesSFhardSerena Williams4-6 6-2 6-3
1999-08-30US OpenFhardSerena Williams6-3 7-6
1999-05-03RomeQFclayMartina Hingis6-2 6-2
1999-03-18Key BiscayneSFhardSerena Williams6-4 7-6
1998-08-10Manhattan BeachQFhardMartina Hingis6-4 6-1
1998-03-19Key BiscayneQFhardMartina Hingis6-3 1-6 7-6

Serve vs return

This season
Williams S.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hingis M.

Hingis M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Williams S.

Serve advantage — Williams S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Williams S.Hingis M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
75%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Williams S.Hingis M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
74
Break points won·Dominant
96
68
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
46
Tiebreaks·
95
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Draw

Final
Williams S.
Halard Decugis J.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Williams S.
Hingis M.
6-37-5
Halard Decugis J.
Davenport L.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Davenport L.
Martinez C.
6-76-36-2
Hingis M.
Schett B.
6-76-36-3
Williams S.
Sanchez Vicario A.
6-26-3
Halard Decugis J.
Pierce M.
7-56-2
R16
Schett B.
Zvereva N.
2-64-2
Sanchez Vicario A.
Dragomir Ilie R.
6-36-1
Hingis M.
Raymond L.
6-14-66-3
Martinez C.
Morariu C.
7-56-2
Davenport L.
Huber A.
6-26-2
Pierce M.
Sugiyama A.
6-27-5
Halard Decugis J.
Frazier A.
7-67-5
Williams S.
Schnyder P.
6-36-1
R32
Huber A.
Stevenson A.
6-46-4
Raymond L.
Lucic M.
6-36-1
Zvereva N.
Spirlea I.
6-46-77-5
Schett B.
Gorrochategui I.
6-36-2
Dragomir Ilie R.
Kremer A.
2-67-66-2
Schnyder P.
Serna M.
6-36-4
Williams S.
Likhovtseva E.
4-66-36-1
Frazier A.
Tauziat N.
3-67-56-2
Halard Decugis J.
Majoli I.
6-16-4
Sugiyama A.
Dechy N.
6-26-3
Morariu C.
Testud S.
6-16-3
Martinez C.
Plischke S.
6-36-3