Adan Freire Da Silva vs Thijs Boogaard — M25 Sarreguemines Round of 16
Thijs Boogaard defeated Adan Freire Da Silva 7-6, 6-2 in the Round of 16 at the M25 Sarreguemines tournament. Boogaard hit 6 aces to Freire Da Silva's 2 and converted 33% of break points, compared to 0% for his opponent. Boogaard won 81% of his first-serve points to Freire Da Silva's 70%, and secured 2 service breaks to advance.
Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.
Key context
- Match story: Thijs Boogaard closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
How the match was decided
Auto-generatedBoogaard T. took it in straight sets, with two breaks of serve.
- Breaks of serveBoogaard T. 2 · Freire Da Silva A. 0
- 1st-serve points wonBoogaard T. 81% · Freire Da Silva A. 70%
- AcesBoogaard T. 6 · Freire Da Silva A. 2
Turning points
When the match moved- Boogaard T. · Broke, never broken back
Serve flowFreire Da Silva A. broken twice · Boogaard T. unbroken.
- Hold to love/15
- Hold to 30
- Hold to 40 / deuce
- Broken
- Result unknown
Freire Da Silva A.8/10Boogaard T.10/10
Set 1Set 2
Match momentum
Whole matchFreire Da Silva A.Boogaard T.Late momentumBoogaard T.50
4Last 12 points8
8Last 3 games9
0/4Break points2/6
Break of serve
Serve & return performance
Key performance gapsFirst-serve pointsBoogaard T. won 81% of points behind the first serve, Freire Da Silva A. 70%. Largest performance gap of the match.+11 ptsFreire Da Silva A.1st-serve pts won70%Boogaard T.1st-serve pts won81%
Common opponents
0 shared · last 12 monthsNo common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.
Head-to-head
1 meeting · Boogaard T. leads 1–001
- Boogaard T.October 2026M25 SarregueminesThis matchCarpet6-7(2) 2-6
Draw
Closing odds
Player context
Before the matchFreire Da Silva A.Boogaard T.1 560ELO1 5624–6Last 104–627Age18
Cite this
Thijs Boogaard beat Adan Freire Da Silva 6-7(2) 2-6. Umpiry, "Adan Freire Da Silva vs Thijs Boogaard — M25 Sarreguemines Round of 16", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-10-22/boogaard-vs-silva-m25-sarreguemines-r16?utm_source=cite (as of 22 October 2026).