M. Figl vs Kris Van Wyk — M15 Monastir Round of 32
Kris Van Wyk defeated M. Figl in the Round of 32 of the M15 Monastir tournament, winning 6-1, 6-3 on hard courts. Van Wyk converted 40% of his break points and secured four service breaks, while Figl was unable to capitalize on any of his break point opportunities. Van Wyk and Figl were even in aces, 2-2, but Van Wyk had fewer double faults, 1-5.
Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.
Key context
- Match story: Kris Van Wyk dropped just 4 games past M. Figl.
How the match was decided
Auto-generatedvan Wyk K. took it in straight sets, with four breaks of serve.
- Breaks of servevan Wyk K. 4 · Figl M. 0
- 1st-serve points wonvan Wyk K. 72% · Figl M. 60%
- Acesvan Wyk K. 2 · Figl M. 2
Turning points
When the match moved- van Wyk K. · Broke, never broken back
- van Wyk K. · Broke to take the set
- van Wyk K. · Broke, never broken back
Serve flowFigl M. broken 4 times · van Wyk K. unbroken.
- Hold to love/15
- Hold to 30
- Hold to 40 / deuce
- Broken
- Result unknown
Figl M.4/8van Wyk K.8/8
Set 1Set 2
Match momentum
Whole matchFigl M.van Wyk K.Late momentumvan Wyk K.43
5Last 12 points7
14Last 3 games11
0/2Break points4/10
Break of serve
Serve & return performance
Key performance gapsFirst-serve pointsvan Wyk K. won 72% of points behind the first serve, Figl M. 60%. Largest performance gap of the match.+12 ptsFigl M.1st-serve pts won60%van Wyk K.1st-serve pts won72%
Double faultsvan Wyk K. served 1 double fault, Figl M. 5.+4Figl M.5van Wyk K.1
Common opponents
0 shared · last 12 monthsNo common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.
Head-to-head
1 meeting · van Wyk K. leads 1–001
- van Wyk K.October 2026M15 MonastirThis matchHard1-6 3-6
Draw
Closing odds
Player context
Before the matchFigl M.van Wyk K.1 543ELO1 6051 474Hard ELO1 5875–5Last 107–322Age30
Cite this
Kris Van Wyk beat M. Figl 1-6 3-6. Umpiry, "M. Figl vs Kris Van Wyk — M15 Monastir Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-10-14/figl-vs-wyk-m15-monastir-r32?utm_source=cite (as of 14 October 2026).