Luca Castagnola vs Josh Manuel — M15 Monastir Round of 32
Luca Castagnola defeated Josh Manuel 6-3, 6-3 in the Round of 32 of the M15 Monastir tournament. Castagnola hit two aces and one double fault, winning 76 percent of his first serves and converting 57 percent of break points. He broke Manuel's serve four times, compared to Manuel's one service break.
Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.
Key context
- Match story: Luca Castagnola dropped just 6 games past Josh Manuel.
How the match was decided
Auto-generatedCastagnola L. took it in straight sets, with four breaks of serve.
- Breaks of serveCastagnola L. 4 · Manuel J. 1
- 1st-serve points wonCastagnola L. 76% · Manuel J. 59%
- AcesCastagnola L. 2 · Manuel J. 0
Turning points
When the match moved- Manuel J. · Broke back
- Castagnola L. · Broke, never broken back
- Castagnola L. · Broke to take the set
- Castagnola L. · Broke, never broken back
Serve flowCastagnola L. broken once · Manuel J. broken 4 times.
- Hold to love/15
- Hold to 30
- Hold to 40 / deuce
- Broken
- Result unknown
Castagnola L.8/9Manuel J.5/9
Set 1Set 2
Match momentum
Whole matchCastagnola L.Manuel J.Late momentumCastagnola L.21
9Last 12 points3
10Last 3 games6
4/7Break points1/2
Break of serve
Serve & return performance
Key performance gapsFirst-serve pointsCastagnola L. won 76% of points behind the first serve, Manuel J. 59%. Largest performance gap of the match.+17 ptsCastagnola L.1st-serve pts won76%Manuel J.1st-serve pts won59%
Common opponents
0 shared · last 12 monthsNo common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.
Head-to-head
1 meeting · Castagnola L. leads 1–010
- Castagnola L.October 2026M15 MonastirThis matchHard6-3 6-3
Draw
Closing odds
Player context
Before the matchCastagnola L.Manuel J.1 581ELO1 5091 538Hard ELO1 5185–5Last 107–324Age21
Cite this
Luca Castagnola beat Josh Manuel 6-3 6-3. Umpiry, "Luca Castagnola vs Josh Manuel — M15 Monastir Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-10-14/castagnola-vs-manuel-m15-monastir-r32?utm_source=cite (as of 14 October 2026).