Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Antofagasta Final
Why
Surface+46 Clay Elo edgeSupports Seyboth Wild T.
Overall ratingOverall Elo 1532Supports Seyboth Wild T.
Recent run9-match win streakSupports Seyboth Wild T.
Head-to-headLeads 3–1 on clayInformative
Long matches1 three-setter in 14 daysSupports Seyboth Wild T.
ELO1 804
Clay ELO1 750
Last 109–1
Age26
Height185 cm
PlaysRight
EarningsCareer $2.5M2026 $155K
ELO1 707
Clay ELO1 689
Last 108–2
Age26
Height178 cm
PlaysRight
EarningsCareer $453K2026 $156K
Thiago Seyboth Wild faces Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva in the Antofagasta final on clay. Thiago Seyboth Wild holds the paper edge — ranked #136, leading the head-to-head 3–1, a roughly 50-point clay Elo advantage. Recent clay form is closely matched.
Key context
- Freshness: Thiago Seyboth Wild comes in with 1 days of rest and 68 games in 14d, vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva's 1 and 117.
- Last match: Thiago Seyboth Wild dropped just 5 games past Lautaro Midon.
- Head-to-head: Thiago Seyboth Wild leads the head-to-head 3–1. Last met at Santiago CH 2023.
Common opponents
0 shared · last 12 monthsNo common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.
Head-to-head
4 meetings · Seyboth Wild T. leads 3–131
- Seyboth Wild T.March 2023Santiago CHClay6-3 6-2
- Seyboth Wild T.November 2022Sao Leopoldo CHClay6-2 7-5
- Seyboth Wild T.September 2022Buenos Aires CHClay6-4 6-4
- Reis Da Silva J.May 2018Brazil F4Clay6-7(1) 6-3 6-2
Evidence
Seyboth Wild T.Reis Da Silva J.
FormLast 10 matches each · 2026
Win–loss9–1 (ahead)8–2
Season win rate69% (37–17) (ahead)50% (25–25)
RatingUmpiry ELO
Overall ELO1804 (ahead)1707
Clay-court ELO1750 (ahead)1689
Serve vs returnLast 32 vs 36 matches
1st-serve points won74% (ahead)67%
Return points won40% (ahead)39%
Aces / match4.8 (ahead)3.0
ClutchLast 32 vs 36 matches
Break points saved67% (ahead)61%
Draw
Odds
Cite this
Umpiry, "Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Antofagasta Final", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-10-11/silva-vs-wild-antofagasta-f?utm_source=cite (as of 11 October 2026).