Christian Langmo vs Dominik Recek — Palermo Qualifying Round of 32

PalermoQ32QualifyingClaySun 4 Oct · 16:45Final1h 46m

Christian Langmo defeated Dominik Recek 7-6, 6-4 in the qualifying round 3 of the Palermo tournament on clay. Langmo hit 6 aces and 1 double fault, while Recek had 7 aces and 2 double faults. Langmo converted 67% of break points and broke Recek's serve twice, compared to Recek's one service break.

Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.

Key context

How the match was decided

Auto-generated

Langmo C. took it in straight sets, with two breaks of serve.

  • Breaks of serveLangmo C. 2 · Recek D. 1
  • 1st-serve points wonLangmo C. 72% · Recek D. 72%
  • AcesLangmo C. 6 · Recek D. 7

Turning points

When the match moved
  1. Set 24–4Break backLangmo C. · Broke back
  2. Set 26–4SetLangmo C. · Broke to take the set
Serve flowLangmo C. broken once · Recek D. broken twice.
  • Hold to love/15
  • Hold to 30
  • Hold to 40 / deuce
  • Broken
  • Result unknown
Langmo C.
10/11Recek D.
9/11
Set 1Set 2

Match momentum

Whole matchLangmo C.Recek D.
EvenLangmo C.Recek D.
Late momentumLangmo C.52
8Last 12 points4
13Last 3 games6
1/2Break points1/4

Break of serve

Match statistics

Langmo C.Recek D.
Serve
  • 6Aces7
  • 1Double faults2
  • 72%1st serve points won72%
  • 91% · 10/11Service games held82% · 9/11
Return
  • 67%Break points won25%
  • 2Breaks of serve1

Common opponents

0 shared · last 12 months
No common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.

Head-to-head

1 meeting · Langmo C. leads 1–0
10

Draw

Closing odds

Player context

Before the match
Langmo C.Recek D.1 637ELO1 6201 541Clay ELO1 5923–7Last 105–530Age31191 cmHeight191 cmRightPlaysRightCareer $174K2026 $20KEarningsCareer $50K2026 $7K

Match info

  • Started16:45 local
  • Duration1h 46m

Cite this

Christian Langmo beat Dominik Recek 7-6(6) 6-4. Umpiry, "Christian Langmo vs Dominik Recek — Palermo Qualifying Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-10-04/langmo-vs-recek-palermo-q32?utm_source=cite (as of 4 October 2026).