Jordan Lee vs Khololwam Montsi — M15 Fayetteville Round of 32
Jordan Lee defeated Khololwam Montsi in the Round of 32 at the M15 Fayetteville tournament. The match ended with a score of 6-7, 6-3, 6-1 in favor of Lee. Lee converted 56 percent of his break points and made five service breaks, compared to Montsi's one, to secure the win.
Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.
Key context
- Match story: Jordan Lee dropped the opening set before beating Khololwam Montsi 6–7 6–3 6–1.
How the match was decided
Auto-generatedLee J. came through in three sets, with five breaks of serve.
- Breaks of serveLee J. 5 · Montsi K. 1
- 1st-serve points wonLee J. 68% · Montsi K. 59%
- AcesLee J. 2 · Montsi K. 2
Turning points
When the match moved- Lee J. · Broke back
- Lee J. · Broke, never broken back
- Lee J. · Broke to take the set
- Lee J. · Broke, never broken back
Serve flowLee J. broken once · Montsi K. broken 5 times.
- Hold to love/15
- Hold to 30
- Hold to 40 / deuce
- Broken
- Result unknown
Lee J.13/14Montsi K.9/14
Set 1Set 2Set 3
Match momentum
Whole matchLee J.Montsi K.Late momentumLee J.67
9Last 12 points3
10Last 3 games6
5/9Break points1/3
Break of serve
Serve & return performance
Key performance gapsDouble faultsLee J. served 0 double faults, Montsi K. 4. Largest performance gap of the match.+4Lee J.0Montsi K.4
First-serve pointsLee J. won 68% of points behind the first serve, Montsi K. 59%.+9 ptsLee J.1st-serve pts won68%Montsi K.1st-serve pts won59%
Common opponents
0 shared · last 12 monthsNo common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.
Head-to-head
1 meeting · Lee J. leads 1–010
- Lee J.September 2026M15 FayettevilleThis matchHard6-7(0) 6-3 6-1
Draw
Closing odds
Next up
Player context
Before the matchLee J.Montsi K.1 515ELO1 6191 507Hard ELO1 6063–6Last 109–116Age23
Cite this
Jordan Lee beat Khololwam Montsi 6-7(0) 6-3 6-1. Umpiry, "Jordan Lee vs Khololwam Montsi — M15 Fayetteville Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-09-29/lee-vs-montsi-m15-fayetteville-r32?utm_source=cite (as of 29 September 2026).