Dayeon Back vs Maya Joint — Korea Open - Seoul Round of 16

Maya Joint defeated Dayeon Back in the Round of 16 at the Korea Open in Seoul, winning 6-2, 6-1 on hard courts. Joint and Back were both perfect in converting break points, but Joint secured two service breaks to Back's one, in addition to committing one fewer double fault. The match ended with neither player recording an ace.

Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.

Key context

How the match was decided

Auto-generated

Joint M. took it in straight sets, with five breaks of serve.

  • Breaks of serveJoint M. 5 · Back D. 1
  • 1st-serve points wonJoint M. 61% · Back D. 50%
  • Double faultsJoint M. 1 · Back D. 2

Turning points

When the match moved
  1. Set 12–2Break backJoint M. · Broke back
  2. Set 12–4BreakJoint M. · Broke, never broken back
  3. Set 12–6SetJoint M. · Broke to take the set
  4. Set 21–3BreakJoint M. · Broke, never broken back
Serve flowBack D. broken 5 times · Joint M. broken once.
  • Hold to love/15
  • Hold to 30
  • Hold to 40 / deuce
  • Broken
  • Result unknown
Back D.
2/7Joint M.
7/8
Set 1Set 2

Match momentum

Whole matchBack D.Joint M.
EvenBack D.Joint M.
Late momentumJoint M.33
5Last 12 points7
7Last 3 games15
1/1Break points5/5

Break of serve

Match statistics

Back D.Joint M.
Serve
  • 0Aces0
  • 2Double faults1
  • 50%1st serve points won61%
  • 29% · 2/7Service games held88% · 7/8
Return
  • 100%Break points won100%
  • 1Breaks of serve5

Common opponents

0 shared · last 12 months
No common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.

Head-to-head

1 meeting · Joint M. leads 1–0
01

Draw

Closing odds

Player context

Before the match
Back D.Joint M.1 714ELO1 8431 696Hard ELO1 7304–6Last 106–424Age20Career $168K2026 $43KEarningsCareer $2.5M2026 $1.2M

Match info

  • Started14:00 local

Cite this

Maya Joint beat Dayeon Back 2-6 1-6. Umpiry, "Dayeon Back vs Maya Joint — Korea Open - Seoul Round of 16", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-09-23/back-vs-joint-korea-open-seoul-r16?utm_source=cite (as of 23 September 2026).