Merel Hoedt vs Iva Ivanova — W50 Pazardzhik Round of 32

W50 PazardzhikR32ClayTue 15 Sept · 11:31Final

Iva Ivanova defeated Merel Hoedt in the Round of 32 at the W50 Pazardzhik tournament on clay. The match ended with a score of 3-6, 6-4, 7-5 in favor of Ivanova. Key stats included Ivanova's 2 aces and 15 double faults compared to Hoedt's 0 aces and 8 double faults, with Ivanova converting 44% of break points and Hoedt converting 39%, and Ivanova securing 8 service breaks to Hoedt's 7.

Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.

Key context

How the match was decided

Auto-generated

Ivanova I. came through in three sets.

  • 1st-serve points wonIvanova I. 65% · Hoedt M. 55%
  • AcesIvanova I. 2 · Hoedt M. 0
  • Double faultsIvanova I. 15 · Hoedt M. 8

Match momentum

Whole matchHoedt M.Ivanova I.
EvenHoedt M.Ivanova I.
Late momentumIvanova I.47
3Last 12 points9
6Last 3 games13
7/18Break points7/14

Break of serve

Match statistics

Hoedt M.Ivanova I.
Serve
  • 0Aces2
  • 8Double faults15
  • 55%1st serve points won65%
  • 50% · 8/16Service games held53% · 8/15
Return
  • 39%Break points won44%
  • 7Breaks of serve8

Serve & return performance

Key performance gaps
Double faultsHoedt M. served 8 double faults, Ivanova I. 15. Largest performance gap of the match.+7Hoedt M.8Ivanova I.15
First-serve pointsIvanova I. won 65% of points behind the first serve, Hoedt M. 55%.+10 ptsHoedt M.1st-serve pts won55%Ivanova I.1st-serve pts won65%

Common opponents

0 shared · last 12 months
No common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.

Head-to-head

1 meeting · Ivanova I. leads 1–0
01

Draw

Closing odds

Player context

Before the match
Hoedt M.Ivanova I.1 593ELO1 5761 587Clay ELO1 5177–3Last 103–727Age20Career $88K2026 $12KEarningsCareer $25K2026 $10K

Match info

  • Started11:31 local

Cite this

Iva Ivanova beat Merel Hoedt 6-3 4-6 5-7. Umpiry, "Merel Hoedt vs Iva Ivanova — W50 Pazardzhik Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-09-15/hoedt-vs-ivanova-w50-pazardzhik-r32?utm_source=cite (as of 15 September 2026).