UMPIRY
EN

Rei Sakamoto vs Ji Sung Nam — Shanghai Round of 32

ShanghaiR32HardTue 8 Sept · 17:30Final

Ji Sung Nam defeated Rei Sakamoto in the Round of 32 at the Shanghai tournament, winning 7-6, 6-4 on hard courts. Ji Sung Nam hit 3 aces and 0 double faults, while Rei Sakamoto had 7 aces and 2 double faults. Ji Sung Nam converted 60% of break points and did not concede a service break, while Rei Sakamoto converted 40% of break points and had 2 service breaks.

Generated automatically from Umpiry match data.

Key context

How the match was decided

Auto-generated

Nam J. took it in straight sets, with three breaks of serve.

  • Breaks of serveNam J. 3 · Sakamoto R. 2
  • 1st-serve points wonNam J. 73% · Sakamoto R. 80%
  • AcesNam J. 3 · Sakamoto R. 7

Turning points

When the match moved
  1. Set 21–1Break backNam J. · Broke back
  2. Set 24–4Break backNam J. · Broke back
  3. Set 24–6SetNam J. · Broke to take the set
Serve flowSakamoto R. broken 3 times · Nam J. broken twice.
  • Hold to love/15
  • Hold to 30
  • Hold to 40 / deuce
  • Broken
  • Result unknown
Sakamoto R.
8/11Nam J.
9/11
Set 1Set 2

Match momentum

Whole matchSakamoto R.Nam J.
EvenSakamoto R.Nam J.
Late momentumNam J.75
2Last 12 points10
5Last 3 games10
2/4Break points2/4

Break of serve

Match statistics

Sakamoto R.Nam J.
Serve
  • 7Aces3
  • 2Double faults0
  • 80%1st serve points won73%
  • 73% · 8/11Service games held82% · 9/11
Return
  • 40%Break points won60%
  • 2Breaks of serve3

Common opponents

0 shared · last 12 months
No common opponents in the last 12 months. Surface form and ELO carry more weight here.

Head-to-head

1 meeting · Nam J. leads 1–0
01

Draw

Closing odds

Player context

Before the match
Sakamoto R.Nam J.1 879ELO1 6241 773Hard ELO1 5966–4Last 105–520Age33193 cmHeight183 cmRightPlaysRight

Match info

  • Started17:30 local

Cite this

Ji Sung Nam beat Rei Sakamoto 6-7(3) 4-6. Umpiry, "Rei Sakamoto vs Ji Sung Nam — Shanghai Round of 32", https://umpiry.com/match/2026-09-08/nam-vs-sakamoto-shanghai-r32?utm_source=cite (as of 8 September 2026).