Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jakub MensikMontreal Round of 16

Montreal · ATP · Round of 16
#70ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWWLLLWLWL
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2026 ·
hard
#17ATP
1931ELO
1893Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWLWLLWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
vs
Mensik J.

Botic Van De Zandschulp faces Jakub Mensik in the Montreal round of 16 on hard. Jakub Mensik is the paper favourite — ranked #17, a roughly 180-point hard Elo advantage — but Botic Van De Zandschulp rides a 3-match win streak.

Win Probability

Pre-match · updated 09:50 UTC
Van De Zandschulp B.25%
Mensik J.75%
Toss-up
50–58%
Slight edge
58–67%
Clear favourite
67–80%
Strong favourite
80%+

Clear favourite · Mensik J. clearly ahead, but no certainty

Calibrated model · 65% favourite accuracy (2025–26, out-of-sample). Probability is a statistical estimate, not a certainty. How it works.

Key context

Common opponents

Last 12 months
15 common opponents · Van De Zandschulp B. 8–9 · Mensik J. 13–6
Mensik J. better · same surface, 35 days apart · incl. team event · ⚠ retirement-shortened match
Includes tour-level, 125s, qualifying and team events (⚑). Walkovers excluded. Describes past results in different contexts — not a prediction.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1710
Surface ELO
7.3+182 Hard Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1931
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
5.95 of last 10 on hard
Surface form
6.36 of last 10 on hard
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.02 three-setters in 14 days
3-set count
0.03 three-setters in 14 days
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

26 vs 25 matches

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
12.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Mensik J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
84
Break points saved·Even
93
96
Break points won·Clear edge
54
69
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
58
65

Van De Zandschulp B.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 82 games (7d) · Mensik J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Weather forecast
20°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 75%

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Draw