Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Taro DanielBastad Round of 32

Bastad · ATP · Round of 32
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLWLLLLLW
Sets
Tuesday, 14 July 2026 ·
clay
COURT 1 · 2nd on
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWWWWWWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
vs
Daniel T.

Botic Van De Zandschulp faces Taro Daniel in the Bastad round of 32 on clay. Botic Van De Zandschulp is the paper favourite — ranked #55, defending last year's round of 16, a roughly 150-point clay Elo advantage — but Taro Daniel arrives in form, winning 4 of their last 5 on clay to Botic Van De Zandschulp's 1.

Win Probability

Pre-match · updated 02:20 UTC
Van De Zandschulp B.77%
Daniel T.23%
Toss-up
50–58%
Slight edge
58–67%
Clear favourite
67–80%
Strong favourite
80%+

Clear favourite · Van De Zandschulp B. clearly ahead, but no certainty

Calibrated model · 65% favourite accuracy (2025–26, out-of-sample). Probability is a statistical estimate, not a certainty. How it works.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
Form & Matchup
6.9+148 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1542
7.2Overall Elo 1743
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1567
5.0First meeting on clay
H2H
5.0First meeting on clay
3.95 of last 10 on clay
Surface form
8.89 of last 10 on clay
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
4.02 three-setters in 14 days
3.0Grass → Clay
Surface transition
Context
6.0Reached the last 16 here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year
5.0Opponent hot: 9 of last 10
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Form trajectory

Direction of recent form — results vs Elo expectation blended with serve/return vs each player's baseline, over the last few months. About

20 vs 26 matches

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
55%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.4
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
93
Break points won·Dominant
68
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
16
Tiebreaks·Even
81
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Daniel T.
33
Serve
74
Return

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Clear edge
91
69

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

When it starts

2nd on COURT 1 · not before Followed By · 1 match still to finish ahead

  1. 1Ofner S. v Tirante T.
  2. 2Van De Zandschulp B. v Daniel T.This match
  3. 3Altmaier D. v Gaston H.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather forecast
25°CClear
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 64%

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.