Andres Martin vs Jason JungNewport Qualifying Semi-final

Newport · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Semi-final
1337ELO
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWWWLWLWLW
Sets
Sunday, 5 July 2026 ·
#1095ATP
1420ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLLLLLWLLW
Martin A.
vs
Jung J.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.0Overall Elo 1337
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1420
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Form trajectory

Martin A.Stable
Jung J.Not enough recent matches

Direction of recent form — results vs Elo expectation blended with serve/return vs each player's baseline, over the last few months. About

26 vs 3 matches

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
72%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
39%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
55%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Clear edge
57%
40%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving79% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Serve advantage — Martin A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
18
Break points saved·Even
60
64
Break points won·Slight edge
14
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
52
18
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
50
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.