Mark Lajal vs Paul JubbIlkley Qualifying Final

Ilkley · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Final
#154ATP
1598ELO
1587Grass ELO
$55kYTD
$612kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWLLWLWW
1 — 2
Sets
Monday, 8 June 2026 ·
grass
COURT 5 · 2nd on
#325ATP
1426ELO
1445Grass ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWLWL

Paul Jubb edged the deciding set 7-6 to get past Mark Lajal in the Ilkley qualifying final.

Key context

  • Set 1, game 2: Paul Jubb broke serve.
  • Comeback: Paul Jubb recovered from a set deficit to win.
  • Pressure points: Mark Lajal converted 2 of 4 break points; Paul Jubb converted 4 of 10 break points.

Win Probability

Pre-match · updated 12:20 UTC
Lajal M.82%
Jubb P.18%
Toss-up
50–58%
Slight edge
58–67%
Clear favourite
67–80%
Strong favourite
80%+

Strong favourite · Lajal M. heavily favoured

Calibrated model · 63% favourite accuracy (2025–26, out-of-sample). Probability is a statistical estimate, not a certainty. How it works.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
Form & Matchup
6.8+141 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Grass Elo 1445
7.2Overall Elo 1598
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1426
5.0First meeting on grass
H2H
5.0First meeting on grass
6.97 of last 10 on grass
Surface form
6.36 of last 10 on grass
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
Country comfort
6.4Home country · 4/10 here
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Lajal M.
792651
Jubb P.
676772

Conditions

Weather
13°COvercast
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 68%

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Statistics

Recent form
61%1st serve in+1%62%
74%1st serve points won+9%65%
48%2nd serve points won+1%47%
64%Service points won+6%58%
37%Return points won+5%42%
69%Break points saved+13%56%
7.4Aces / match+3.93.5
3.2Double faults / match+1.44.6

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.