Celine Naef vs Maddison Inglis — Birmingham 125 Round of 32

Birmingham 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Celine Naef
#193WTA
1677ELO
1635Grass ELO
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 June 2026
grass
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#148WTA
1598ELO
1492Grass ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWL
Naef C.
6-2 6-3
Inglis M.
Naef C.
662
Inglis M.
23–

Celine Naef defeated Maddison Inglis 6-2 6-3 in the Birmingham 125 round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Maddison Inglis came in ranked #148, defending last year's round of 32, but Celine Naef had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 4 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Inglis M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Serve advantage — Naef C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Inglis M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Naef C.Inglis M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
25
Break points saved·Dominant
81
50
Break points won·Dominant
87
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
42
Tiebreaks·
—
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Inglis M.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
97

Naef C.: 8 days rest · 6 matches (14d) · Inglis M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Eala A.
Bartunkova N.
5-76-37-5
Semi-finals
Bartunkova N.
Krueger A.
6-47-67
Eala A.
Masarova R.
6-24-66-3
Quarter-finals
Eala A.
Sawangkaew M.
6-36-2
Bartunkova N.
Stojsavljevic M.
6-46-787-64
Masarova R.
Stoiana M.
6-43-66-0
Krueger A.
Preston T.
2-66-36-4
R16
Sawangkaew M.
Day K.
6-46-1
Krueger A.
Tjen J.
6-16-3
Preston T.
Swan K.
6-46-2
Stojsavljevic M.
Kalieva E.
6-46-726-2
Bartunkova N.
Knutson G.
6-47-64
Stoiana M.
Naef C.
7-52-67-65
Masarova R.
Maria T.
6-46-3
Eala A.
Charaeva A.
6-27-5
R32
Knutson G.
Garland J.
7-666-3
Bartunkova N.
Dart H.
3-66-37-5
Stojsavljevic M.
Jones E.
3-66-17-5
Naef C.
Inglis M.
6-26-3
Masarova R.
Martincova T.
6-766-16-1
Maria T.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-06-1
Day K.
Vandewinkel H.
7-626-2
Sawangkaew M.
Klimovicova L.
6-47-5
Charaeva A.
Minnen G.
6-36-1
Eala A.
Hon P.
6-06-2
Stoiana M.
Sun L.
4-67-686-2
Tjen J.
Hibino N.
6-43-66-2
Krueger A.
Sakatsume H.
6-46-3
Preston T.
Dudeney A.
6-46-746-3
Kalieva E.
Gibson T.
7-52-66-4
Swan K.
Tomljanovic A.
7-643-2