Mirra Andreeva vs Jil TeichmannRoland Garros Round of 16

Roland Garros · WTA · Round of 16
#5WTA
2074ELO
2034Clay ELO
$5.4MYTD
$13MCAREER
19 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 31 May 2026 ·
clay
Court Suzanne-Lenglen · 3rd on
#124WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Andreeva M.
6-3 6-2
Teichmann J.
Andreeva M.
662
Teichmann J.
320

Mirra Andreeva won seven games in a row to see off Jil Teichmann 6-3 6-2 in the Roland Garros round of 16.

Key context

  • Set 2, game 2: Mirra Andreeva broke serve.
  • Pressure points: Mirra Andreeva converted 6 of 11 break points; Jil Teichmann converted 2 of 4 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Andreeva M.
Teichmann J.
Break points won
6/11
2/4
Break points saved
2/4
5/11

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Andreeva M.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Andreeva M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Andreeva M.Teichmann J.
62
Serve
18
Return

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
73%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
68%
54%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
52%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Clear edge
58%
44%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
0.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
94
50
Break points saved·Dominant
96
71
Break points won·Clear edge
100
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
32
Tiebreaks·Even
94
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
8.28 of last 10 on clay
Surface form
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
Context
7.0Reached the quarters here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Slight edge
94
100

Andreeva M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Teichmann J.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 50%
R128
R64
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final