Colton Smith vs Tyler Zink — Little Rock Quarter-final

Little Rock · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA3
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 30 May 2026 ·
hard
STADIUM · 4th on
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Smith C.
6-4 7-6
Zink T.
Smith C.
6772
Zink T.
4640

Colton Smith reeled off five straight games on the way to a 6-4 7-6 win over Tyler Zink in the Little Rock quarter-final.

Key context

  • Set 1, game 4: A 13-point game with four deuces went Tyler Zink's way.
  • Set 1, game 5: Tyler Zink broke serve.
  • Pressure points: Colton Smith converted 2 of 5 break points; Tyler Zink converted 1 of 5 break points.

Pressure & serve by court

Smith C.
Zink T.
Break points won
2/5
1/5
Break points saved
4/5
3/5

Break points from this match. Serve-by-court shows the share of service points won from each side of the court; the court side alternates every point.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-21WashingtonQ2hardColton Smith4-6 6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Zink T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Zink T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+164 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1354
6.9Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1376
7.8Leads 2–0 on hard
H2H
2.2Trails 0–2 on hard
4.24 of last 10 on hard
Surface form
6.76 of last 10 on hard
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
4.02 three-setters in 14 days
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Zink T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
85

Smith C.: 18 days rest · Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
27°CMainly clear
Wind 2 km/hHumidity 84%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Sweeny D.[1]
Aguiard E.
3-64-6
Ilagan A.
Uchiyama Y.
6-736-47-5
Monday J.[2]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Butvilas E.[6]
7-637-6
Smith C.[3]
Svajda T.
6-27-5
Milavsky D.
Wu T.
3-67-631-0
Ellis B.
Zink T.
4-67-53-6
Hohmann R.
Cassone M.[7]
6-41-66-3
Mmoh M.[5]
Matsuoka H.
5-76-36-1
Moriya H.[6]
Legout T.
2-63-6
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
6-786-75
Bicknell B.
Tomic B.[4]
6-34-64-6
Sun F.[8]
Bobo D.
6-26-1
Friend J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Arutiunian E.
Boulais J.[7]
3-62-6
Searle H.[3]
Mejia N.[2]
3-63-6
Aguiard E.
Ilagan A.
6-761-3
Monday J.[2]
Mayo A.
6-735-7
Smith C.[3]
Milavsky D.
6-36-2
Zink T.
Hohmann R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[5]
Legout T.
6-26-2
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[4]
6-46-745-7
Sun F.[8]
Friend J.[8]
2-62-6
Boulais J.[7]
Mejia N.[2]
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Mayo A.
7-6106-746-3
Smith C.[3]
Zink T.
6-47-64
Mmoh M.[5]
Tomic B.[4]
6-36-3
Friend J.[8]
Boulais J.[7]
6-23-65-7
Ilagan A.
Smith C.[3]
3-65-7
Mmoh M.[5]
Boulais J.[7]
1-66-16-2
Smith C.[3]
Mmoh M.[5]
6-26-4