Michael Mmoh vs Bernard Tomic — Little Rock Quarter-final

Little Rock · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Mmoh
USA5
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Friday, 29 May 2026 ·
hard
STADIUM · 3rd on
Bernard Tomic
AUS4
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
Mmoh M.
6-3 6-3
Tomic B.
Mmoh M.
662
Tomic B.
330

Michael Mmoh defeated Bernard Tomic 6-3 6-3 in the Little Rock quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
53
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Dominant
31
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
76
Tiebreaks·Even
77
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+147 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Hard Elo 1452
6.6Overall Elo 1618
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1492
5.0First meeting on hard
H2H
5.0First meeting on hard
9.09 of last 10 on hard
Surface form
5.25 of last 10 on hard
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
3-set count
0.03 three-setters in 14 days
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
89
89

Mmoh M.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tomic B.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
27°CClear
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 75%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Sweeny D.[1]
Aguiard E.
3-64-6
Ilagan A.
Uchiyama Y.
6-736-47-5
Monday J.[2]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Butvilas E.[6]
7-637-6
Smith C.[3]
Svajda T.
6-27-5
Milavsky D.
Wu T.
3-67-631-0
Ellis B.
Zink T.
4-67-53-6
Hohmann R.
Cassone M.[7]
6-41-66-3
Mmoh M.[5]
Matsuoka H.
5-76-36-1
Moriya H.[6]
Legout T.
2-63-6
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
6-786-75
Bicknell B.
Tomic B.[4]
6-34-64-6
Sun F.[8]
Bobo D.
6-26-1
Friend J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Arutiunian E.
Boulais J.[7]
3-62-6
Searle H.[3]
Mejia N.[2]
3-63-6
Aguiard E.
Ilagan A.
6-761-3
Monday J.[2]
Mayo A.
6-735-7
Smith C.[3]
Milavsky D.
6-36-2
Zink T.
Hohmann R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[5]
Legout T.
6-26-2
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[4]
6-46-745-7
Sun F.[8]
Friend J.[8]
2-62-6
Boulais J.[7]
Mejia N.[2]
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Mayo A.
7-6106-746-3
Smith C.[3]
Zink T.
6-47-64
Mmoh M.[5]
Tomic B.[4]
6-36-3
Friend J.[8]
Boulais J.[7]
6-23-65-7
Ilagan A.
Smith C.[3]
3-65-7
Mmoh M.[5]
Boulais J.[7]
1-66-16-2
Smith C.[3]
Mmoh M.[5]
6-26-4