Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Mika Brunold — Vicenza Round of 16

Vicenza · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#206ATP
1489ELO
1407Clay ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Thursday, 28 May 2026 ·
clay
CAMPO CENTRALE · 1st on
SUIQ
Mika Brunold
#408ATP
1466ELO
1407Clay ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWL
Hsu Y.
6-2 3-6 6-2
Brunold M.
Hsu Y.
6362
Brunold M.
2621

Yu Hsiou Hsu defeated Mika Brunold 6-2 3-6 6-2 in the Vicenza round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Yu Hsiou Hsu closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hsu Y.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hsu Y.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
57%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hsu Y.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
24
Break points saved·Even
74
72
Break points won·Slight edge
4
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hsu Y.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Brunold M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
5.4+34 Clay Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1509
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1475
3.0Trails 0–1 on clay
H2H
7.0Leads 1–0 on clay
4.24 of last 10 on clay
Surface form
7.67 of last 10 on clay
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hsu Y.Brunold M.
Freshness·
100
—

Hsu Y.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
26°CClear
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 63%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Travaglia S.[1]
Moro Canas A.
6-36-3
Castagnola L.
Squire H.
3-62-6
D. Dedura
Brancaccio R.
6-05-76-2
Pieri S.[12]
Kym J.[8]
6-17-63
Cecchinato M.[4]
Hsu Y.
4-66-73
Brunold M.[3]
Giunta M.
7-6107-64
Vasami J.
Tabacco G.
6-17-64
Compagnucci T.[6]
Bueno G.[6]
7-626-3
Tseng C.[5]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-4
Midon L.
Reis Da Silva J.
7-646-1
Fellin P.
Martin Tiffon P.
4-64-6
Dalla Valle E.
Schwaerzler J.[3]
3-66-33-6
Neumayer L.[7]
Tu L.
7-666-4
Boyer T.
Damas M.
6-776-36-4
Dhamne M.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-67-56-3
Bertola R.
Echargui M.[2]
6-23-66-3
Travaglia S.[1]
Squire H.
6-46-2
D. Dedura
Pieri S.[12]
6-26-3
Hsu Y.
Brunold M.[3]
6-23-66-2
Vasami J.
Compagnucci T.[6]
2-66-46-2
Tseng C.[5]
Midon L.
7-56-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Schwaerzler J.[3]
6-12-67-62
Neumayer L.[7]
Boyer T.
6-26-3
Dhamne M.
Bertola R.
3-64-6
Travaglia S.[1]
D. Dedura
6-26-3
Hsu Y.
Vasami J.
2-63-6
Tseng C.[5]
Martin Tiffon P.
2-66-27-65
Neumayer L.[7]
Bertola R.
6-47-63
Travaglia S.[1]
Vasami J.
5-76-75
Tseng C.[5]
Neumayer L.[7]
7-52-66-74
Vasami J.
Neumayer L.[7]
2-62-6