Sumit Nagal vs Zdenek Kolar — Chisinau Round of 16

Chisinau · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
INDALT
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 27 May 2026 ·
clay
CENTRE COURT · 3rd on
Zdenek Kolar
CZE2
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWL
Nagal S.
6-4 7-6
Kolar Z.
Nagal S.
6772
Kolar Z.
4640

Sumit Nagal defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-4 7-6 in the Chisinau round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Even
71%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
53
Break points won·Slight edge
35
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
Kolar Z.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Back-to-back day (−0.5)
Form & Matchup
4.7Clay Elo 1481
Surface ELO
5.3+22 Clay Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1484
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1510
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
4.54 of last 10 on clay
Surface form
6.87 of last 10 on clay
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.02 three-setters in 14 days
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Weather
30°CPartly cloudy
Wind 19 km/hHumidity 30%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Maestrelli F.[1]
Coppejans K.
7-642-64-6
Jianu F.
Agamenone F.
6-22-63-6
Albot R.
Janvier M.[10]
6-30-0
Djere L.
Skatov T.[8]
4-63-6
Glinka D.[4]
Latinovic S.
6-36-3
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
Broady L.
3-60-6
Cretu C.[6]
Watanuki Y.
6-16-4
Kotov P.
Onclin G.[7]
6-13-66-4
Ymer E.[5]
Purtseladze S.
7-646-2
Nedic A.
Olivieri G.
4-66-45-7
Topo M.
Giustino L.
4-67-52-6
Grenier H.
Nardi L.[3]
4-63-6
Gomez F.[6]
Sakellaridis S.
3-65-7
Galan D.
A. Martinez
6-33-66-71
Nagal S.
Fomin S.[1]
6-46-2
Snitari I.
Kolar Z.[2]
4-63-6
Coppejans K.
Agamenone F.
2-63-6
Albot R.
Skatov T.[8]
1-66-16-4
Glinka D.[4]
Broady L.
2-66-43-6
Cretu C.[6]
Kotov P.
1-66-16-2
Ymer E.[5]
Olivieri G.
2-66-75
Giustino L.
Nardi L.[3]
7-624-64-6
Sakellaridis S.
A. Martinez
7-622-0
Nagal S.
Kolar Z.[2]
6-47-64
Agamenone F.
Albot R.
5-76-72
Broady L.
Cretu C.[6]
3-60-6
Olivieri G.
Nardi L.[3]
6-03-67-64
Sakellaridis S.
Nagal S.
6-16-4
Albot R.
Cretu C.[6]
2-66-42-6
Olivieri G.
Sakellaridis S.
3-64-6
Cretu C.[6]
Sakellaridis S.
7-613-63-6