Blaise Bicknell vs Bernard Tomic — Little Rock Round of 32

Little Rock · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JAM
Blaise Bicknell
#318ATP
1313ELO
1290Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWW
1 — 2
Sets
Monday, 25 May 2026 ·
hard
COURT 1 · 3rd on
Bernard Tomic
AUS4
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Bicknell B.
6-3 4-6 4-6
Tomic B.
Bicknell B.
6441
Tomic B.
3662

Bernard Tomic defeated Blaise Bicknell 3-6 6-4 6-4 in the Little Rock round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bicknell B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bicknell B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bicknell B.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bicknell B.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
52
Break points saved·Dominant
49
92
Break points won·Even
5
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bicknell B.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Hard Elo 1296
Surface ELO
6.9+156 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1321
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1492
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0No prior meetings
6.06 of last 10 on hard
Surface form
3.54 of last 10 on hard
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.01 three-setter in 14 days
6.0Clay → Hard
Surface transition
6.0Clay → Hard
Context
5.0Didn't play here last year
Defending pts
5.0Didn't play here last year

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bicknell B.Tomic B.
Freshness·Dominant
98
71

Bicknell B.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tomic B.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 13 km/hHumidity 74%
R32
R16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Sweeny D.[1]
Aguiard E.
3-64-6
Ilagan A.
Uchiyama Y.
6-736-47-5
Monday J.[2]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Butvilas E.[6]
7-637-6
Smith C.[3]
Svajda T.
6-27-5
Milavsky D.
Wu T.
3-67-631-0
Ellis B.
Zink T.
4-67-53-6
Hohmann R.
Cassone M.[7]
6-41-66-3
Mmoh M.[5]
Matsuoka H.
5-76-36-1
Moriya H.[6]
Legout T.
2-63-6
Martin A.
Shimizu Y.
6-786-75
Bicknell B.
Tomic B.[4]
6-34-64-6
Sun F.[8]
Bobo D.
6-26-1
Friend J.[8]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Arutiunian E.
Boulais J.[7]
3-62-6
Searle H.[3]
Mejia N.[2]
3-63-6
Aguiard E.
Ilagan A.
6-761-3
Monday J.[2]
Mayo A.
6-735-7
Smith C.[3]
Milavsky D.
6-36-2
Zink T.
Hohmann R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[5]
Legout T.
6-26-2
Shimizu Y.
Tomic B.[4]
6-46-745-7
Sun F.[8]
Friend J.[8]
2-62-6
Boulais J.[7]
Mejia N.[2]
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Mayo A.
7-6106-746-3
Smith C.[3]
Zink T.
6-47-64
Mmoh M.[5]
Tomic B.[4]
6-36-3
Friend J.[8]
Boulais J.[7]
6-23-65-7
Ilagan A.
Smith C.[3]
3-65-7
Mmoh M.[5]
Boulais J.[7]
1-66-16-2
Smith C.[3]
Mmoh M.[5]
6-26-4