Adam Walton vs Tung Lin Wu — Jiujiang CH Round of 16

Jiujiang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Adam Walton
AUS3
Adam Walton
#85ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Walton A.
5-7 6-3 7-6
Wu T.
Walton A.
56772
Wu T.
73641

Adam Walton defeated Tung Lin Wu 5-7 6-3 7-6 in the Jiujiang CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #85.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Wu T.
35
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.5
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (40 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Clear edge
20
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+293 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1376
7.9Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1406
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
8.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
2.9
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Wu T.
Freshness·Dominant
57
85

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 87 games (7d) · Wu T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wong C.[4]
Walton A.[3]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.[6]
6-23-67-65
Wong C.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Smith K.
7-657-65
Wong C.[4]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-627-68
Walton A.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-16-757-63
Sun F.
Lajal M.[8]
3-66-36-4
R16
Smith K.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
5-76-06-3
Bolt A.[6]
Hussey G.
6-26-3
Wong C.[4]
Noguchi R.
7-626-2
Lajal M.[8]
Sharipov M.
6-46-4
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
5-76-37-64
Galarneau A.
Broady L.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Ilagan A.
6-26-3
Sun F.
Milic O.
6-46-1
R32
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Masur D.
7-657-65
Bolt A.[6]
Wang A.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Sweeny D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Lajal M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Sharipov M.
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Milic O.
Tokuda R.
6-36-736-1
Sun F.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-636-2
Smith K.
Matsuoka H.
7-644-67-64
Wu T.
Te R.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Mccabe J.
4-66-46-2
Noguchi R.
Hsu Y.
7-56-2
Wong C.[4]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-3
Shimabukuro S.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-0
Hussey G.
Jung J.
6-23-66-3
Walton A.[3]
Cui J.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Dellavedova M.
6-46-0