Coleman Wong vs Adam Walton — Jiujiang CH Final

Jiujiang CH · CHALLENGER · Final
HKG4
Coleman Wong
#111ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
Adam Walton
AUS3
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Wong C.
7-5 7-6
Walton A.
Wong C.
7772
Walton A.
5640

Coleman Wong defeated Adam Walton 7-5 7-6 in the Jiujiang CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79. Coleman Wong extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-25US OpenR64hardColeman Wong7-6(5) 6-2 4-6 6-4
2025-03-19Miami MastersR32hardAdam Walton7-6(6) 4-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Walton A.
37
Serve
35
34
Return
17

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
55%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.3
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
65
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Clear edge
5
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
88
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Walton A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2Hard Elo 1593
Surface ELO
4.8+76 Hard Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1703
4.6
H2H
5.4
2.9
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
4.5
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Walton A.
Freshness·Dominant
89
54

Wong C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wong C.[4]
Walton A.[3]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.[6]
6-23-67-65
Wong C.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Smith K.
7-657-65
Wong C.[4]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-627-68
Walton A.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-16-757-63
Sun F.
Lajal M.[8]
3-66-36-4
R16
Smith K.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
5-76-06-3
Bolt A.[6]
Hussey G.
6-26-3
Wong C.[4]
Noguchi R.
7-626-2
Lajal M.[8]
Sharipov M.
6-46-4
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
5-76-37-64
Galarneau A.
Broady L.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Ilagan A.
6-26-3
Sun F.
Milic O.
6-46-1
R32
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Masur D.
7-657-65
Bolt A.[6]
Wang A.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Sweeny D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Lajal M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Sharipov M.
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Milic O.
Tokuda R.
6-36-736-1
Sun F.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-636-2
Smith K.
Matsuoka H.
7-644-67-64
Wu T.
Te R.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Mccabe J.
4-66-46-2
Noguchi R.
Hsu Y.
7-56-2
Wong C.[4]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-3
Shimabukuro S.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-0
Hussey G.
Jung J.
6-23-66-3
Walton A.[3]
Cui J.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Dellavedova M.
6-46-0