Fajing Sun vs Ognjen Milic — Jiujiang CH Round of 16

Jiujiang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN
Fajing Sun
#270ATP
1496ELO
1473Hard ELO
$32kYTD
$490kCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
SRB
Ognjen Milic
#357ATP
1414ELO
1401Hard ELO
19 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLWW
Sun F.
6-4 6-1
Milic O.
Sun F.
662
Milic O.
410

Fajing Sun defeated Ognjen Milic 6-4 6-1 in the Jiujiang CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sun F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Milic O.

Milic O.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sun F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sun F.Milic O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
51%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sun F.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Milic O.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
10.0
Surface form
5.4
10.012-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sun F.Milic O.
Freshness·Even
94
91

Sun F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Milic O.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wong C.[4]
Walton A.[3]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.[6]
6-23-67-65
Wong C.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Smith K.
7-657-65
Wong C.[4]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-627-68
Walton A.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-16-757-63
Sun F.
Lajal M.[8]
3-66-36-4
R16
Smith K.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
5-76-06-3
Bolt A.[6]
Hussey G.
6-26-3
Wong C.[4]
Noguchi R.
7-626-2
Lajal M.[8]
Sharipov M.
6-46-4
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
5-76-37-64
Galarneau A.
Broady L.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Ilagan A.
6-26-3
Sun F.
Milic O.
6-46-1
R32
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Masur D.
7-657-65
Bolt A.[6]
Wang A.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Sweeny D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Lajal M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Sharipov M.
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Milic O.
Tokuda R.
6-36-736-1
Sun F.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-636-2
Smith K.
Matsuoka H.
7-644-67-64
Wu T.
Te R.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Mccabe J.
4-66-46-2
Noguchi R.
Hsu Y.
7-56-2
Wong C.[4]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-3
Shimabukuro S.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-0
Hussey G.
Jung J.
6-23-66-3
Walton A.[3]
Cui J.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Dellavedova M.
6-46-0