Giles Hussey vs Jason Jung — Jiujiang CH Round of 32

Jiujiang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Giles Hussey
#258ATP
1584ELO
1517Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#1095ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
Hussey G.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Jung J.
Hussey G.
6362
Jung J.
2631

Giles Hussey defeated Jason Jung 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Jiujiang CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Giles Hussey closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hussey G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hussey G.

Serve advantage — Hussey G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Hussey G.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
31%
Break points saved·Clear edge
59%
38%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hussey G.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
21
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
64
Break points won·Dominant
57
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
13
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hussey G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jung J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hussey G.Jung J.
Freshness·Dominant
97
64

Hussey G.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Jung J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 77 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Wong C.[4]
Walton A.[3]
7-57-64
Semi-finals
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.[6]
6-23-67-65
Wong C.[4]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Smith K.
7-657-65
Wong C.[4]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-627-68
Walton A.[3]
Galarneau A.
6-16-757-63
Sun F.
Lajal M.[8]
3-66-36-4
R16
Smith K.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
5-76-06-3
Bolt A.[6]
Hussey G.
6-26-3
Wong C.[4]
Noguchi R.
7-626-2
Lajal M.[8]
Sharipov M.
6-46-4
Walton A.[3]
Wu T.
5-76-37-64
Galarneau A.
Broady L.
6-36-4
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Ilagan A.
6-26-3
Sun F.
Milic O.
6-46-1
R32
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Masur D.
7-657-65
Bolt A.[6]
Wang A.
6-37-62
Galarneau A.
Sweeny D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Lajal M.[8]
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Sharipov M.
Tomic B.
6-26-4
Milic O.
Tokuda R.
6-36-736-1
Sun F.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-636-2
Smith K.
Matsuoka H.
7-644-67-64
Wu T.
Te R.
6-46-1
Ilagan A.
Mccabe J.
4-66-46-2
Noguchi R.
Hsu Y.
7-56-2
Wong C.[4]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-3
Shimabukuro S.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-36-0
Hussey G.
Jung J.
6-23-66-3
Walton A.[3]
Cui J.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Dellavedova M.
6-46-0